Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOLIDAY CRICKET

Canterbury's Collapse In Big Plunket Shield Battle

HIDDLLSTON IN^lfc lfOßM

(By Lr .T. Cbbcf,oft.) ;

> Fresh from, their great yictorj «$ that the Canterbury te^ny woul failed miserably. ' ;'. After the local side had piled up nearly 500, of which Hiddleston and McGirr made over 300 between them, the boys from^the City of the Plains gave one of the poorest exhibitions, of batting by a representative side; ever, witnessed on the Basin Reserve. V'V - What was the cause of Canter- , . bury's collapse? : .; Was it; the, bad wicket, was it or. was it superior bowling by Badcock and McGirr ? ' ' i iAn Easy Wicket. C ; • ,-• 'It certainly was not the; fault of the tvicket, as never once wa|: a batsman out through, a rising 1 or shooting ball. ■The wicket, on the contrary, was ieasy and one which a batsman should .h^ye appreciated. • . .. '.'.'■ Not once did a Canterbury play- i '■-..■ ,er in the first innings endeavor to .drive a ball, notwithstanding the .fact that a number of v balls ; were . ; pitched right' up to '.within a foot' 1 of '-■'■ ' " 'the bat. '' ; £fy ' /: - ■'>■ ; V ■ ' ' ' ; :V; „' '/■ All the baisnien persistently played right back op; their wicket ;~ ; inj fact several full iosses were': just-, blocked instead of being smacked to tlje boundary. .. > .\ VThy Canterbury Failed. ! •Admittedly McGirr andi Badcock' bowled well, but surely, batsmen should be able , to play good bowling. >:I wonder what Dan' fßeese would • fra/ve said if he had been able to wit-' n.esa the miserable^ display of batting Klyen by the Cahterbiury player's? : r ■.-•';• They are .capable .of: .making. 'plenty of runs against any, inter- ■„ provincial bovyling., ,• ; ..- ( v , ,V .'T.'Wiell, how doVyou account for theijj| collapse m both, innings?^. • : '■ ' '■...! Siinply" this:,, After,, the. light rain which had 'fallen v ; ah.d;,the: decision" of the umpires to. postpone play.. ,% 0r an • hour, the ' Canterbury ( batsmen fully expected the wicket to' play, all sorts, of pranks, and were . out before they, left the' pavilion. v.y- V This, together with being up . against Badcock and McGirr for - the first time, and losing a couple, of wickets early on, put the "wind •',' up" the rest of them. / . ' ' "Nerves" . was at the bottpm of this debacle. ; ''"• Nervous Batsmen. '-Most of- the Canterbury •• batsmen Btpod, with both feet behind the batting crease m taking strike, showing plainly) that they wer.e;.not;,going^,tp; be. en-, ticed into playing f oirward on : any : ac- / count, •' . ':;"■ , '.'■;'.;" , ■•/. , The wicket" vfas one on jwhich any captain winning the toss wbuld. have • decided to bat; the ball being: greasy and the turf just damp enough to prevent a bowler getting any break, on, .besides making it difficult for him to get- a proper foothold when delivering. If the Canterbury team had. to ■ bat again to-morrow under the.' ■ : , .same conditi6nsy--*and<«they vplayed „ • the game asrtheyACan^-play- 1 1 v-they ;•;••:• would doubtlessimake a good score.

7 over ! pt^o,;it was lully.expectd but they Smith i.at this' stage had reached 49 after- 2.y 2 -hours' blocking;, ; -and was cheered as he" reached r h|s half hundred with an" unusually 1 smaLrt 1 run.- ■ The' 'co'ngregation sighed " m sympathy I, when the umpire ' outed him. l.b.w.' to Cpririadi after occupying over threes-hours to p^le' up -63, Which in-cluded-a;'couple; of, chances. ■ ". /The Eden colt,' Copper, seemed sjmjl^riy? smitten with sleeping sickness, 11 and - was unbeaten with 26; onfwhen Auckland's innings ;« closed ', at' 3^3. v ->'' ' •, , : -.-' . ' : The r, veteran- 'Dick . Torrkhce had bow lted "43 overs.- for 90 runs, and had. seven Auckland^scalps at his belt. He was lordly cheered as he left the held; it was a; splendid piece of steady plodding with very few loose deliveries.'' ■.. .-. ,. v ' /' .... '.'•■' . ■"•'"' .■\''' i; VT'hV.\Ptego'-fiejd!iigv.was far more snappy' than Aupkland's; but : there, were ijnpresdsopped; catches . on both .sides i than one expects m a .Shield gani)e;; /\ ■ .:' 6verra v couple of hundred m arrears, 1 the southerners; were .taking no

more risks m their second knock after McMullan went for a blob m Simpson's ppening 1 over.'.'■■■:'-'-■ ' : ; ■* , Kirns were v about as frequent as 1 trams parsing the gates until the teatime ad jpiirnment. ' The tliir.d: day's pla^- started disastrously for-.,--the' southerners, Blamires (74) and; Zimmerman -(77) both being bagged behind the sticksi off! fast\ rising ' ones from ■ Simpson. The padre and the .colt had stopped /the rot with a useful partnership of 151. Conradi ,seeitied, set when a shooter :, from * Player* bowled him, for 11, and Knight joined. Galland for the best partnership,of the match. : •: The tail wagged for a while, and ' the innings closed for a .good recoveryat 470, giving Auckland 269 to get oh a wicket that was showing signs of wearing, with oocasional shooters and kickers. Auckland found this out when Blamires., blew, Horspool out with a low daisy-trimmer for a .duck, and Jack Mills was foolishly run out with only 30 on. ' , ; "■■;, :" .. ••■;••• 'Auckland won by five wicket's; Snedden scoring 131 nqt out. .',.'' The "only change m the Auckland team , for- the Canterbury : match is Gerrard't replacing: Secretary Saunders, which : improves > the batting strength but not the bowling.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19260107.2.97

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 1050, 7 January 1926, Page 12

Word Count
820

HOLIDAY CRICKET NZ Truth, Issue 1050, 7 January 1926, Page 12

HOLIDAY CRICKET NZ Truth, Issue 1050, 7 January 1926, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert