Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DOINGS IN DIVORCE

Undefended Suits m Wellington

The Chief Justice, at the Wellington Divorce Court, on Wednesday and Thursday, granted decrees nisi m the following cases: ' Stanley Carpenter v. Fanny Carpenter, misconduct; Arthur Thomas Mimn v. Ida Ellen Munn, desertion; May McKenna v. Bernard Michael McKenna, cruelty and drunkenness; Claude Bertham Willis v. Ruby Florence. Leila Willis, desertion; Annie Webley v. Albert Edward Webley, cruelty and drunkenness; Alax. Thorold Hansen v. Amy Myrtle Elizabeth Hansen, and Frank Herbert Morris, misconduct; Charles Edward Scott v ! Ethel Scott, desertion; Pauline May Wiggins v. William Henry Wiggins misconduct; Lillian Stanley Wilson v i Joseph James Wilson, desertionEunice Marie May Greeks v. George Percival Greeks, desertion; Alice Emma Bowden v. Edwin Thomas Bowden misconduct; Edith Annie Wilson v' William Harold Wilson, desertion; Ann Marion Tozer v. Edward Alfred Tozer misconduct; Louisa. Mildred Levien v' Sydney Henry August Levien, misconduct; Walter Percy Williams v. Elsie Graco Williams, desertion; Annie Anita Eullen v. Percy Stewart Bullen misconduct; Thomas Bramley v. Mary Jane Bramley, misconduct;' William James Corke v. Violet Gwendoline Corke, misconduct; Susan May James v. Albert Edward James, cruelty and desertion; Catherine May Ashley v. Robert John Ashley/misconduct'; John Mitchell v. Margaret Mitchell, misconduct; Mary Elizabeth Poare v. Fredk William Poare, desertion; Margaret McConachy v. James David MeConachy, misconduct; David Albert Roberts v. Lucy Martha Roberts, and Michael O'Connor, misconduct; Maggie May Raft'el v. Simon Raffel, misconduct'Richard Hamilton Philpotts v. Beatrice Philpotts, misconduct; Caroline Kinniburgh v. John Kinniburgh, misconduct; Maud Quill v. John Mitchell Quill, drunkenness and cruelty; Augustus Henry Baggarley v. Lilian Winifred Baggarley, misconduct; Ethel Jean Aston v. Thomas Henry Aston, misconduct. His Honor granted a decree m the case of William Watson Dickinson v. \ Lilian Florence Cecilia Phillips, on the grpund that the latter had been convicted of bigamy. Decisions were not given m the cases of Florence Louisa Sim v. Thomas Sim, misconduct; and Sydney Albert Cross y. Dorothy Oatene May Cross, further evidence being required m each case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19191206.2.8

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 755, 6 December 1919, Page 2

Word Count
328

DOINGS IN DIVORCE NZ Truth, Issue 755, 6 December 1919, Page 2

DOINGS IN DIVORCE NZ Truth, Issue 755, 6 December 1919, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert