of the charges should he published to Mr Heyes. Prisoner himself was rible for the jury's decision m ;ome of the cases, as' his letters showed preat personal feeling;. A« to wlip'lm- •• "-*• sub-section 8 of section C, prisoner hail been guilty of the offence by his 'lea of justification, he must look at the whole ; of the circumstances. Pollock lad com- j mitted a gross, abominable outrage on his sister-in-law, and prisoner, m writ-, me to the head of the department m . which Pollock was employed, anted with' mixed motives ; which was \he rioinLnant one it was impossible to say. Prisoner's action had resulted m the oun'.ic interest atid for him to say that tlrs pl^a of .justification had aggravated the cHence. when he had established '.hat Pollock was unfit to hold his position, vovld l:c to prostitute „ the meaning of {]:e act. Prisoner had been properly convicted and lie would deal with him m a a-itiin way. His Honor believed that prisoner's action had produced good results, "as aj man who is immoral and 'ps. ow**-* verdict of the jury, heen j^*^J-^"*" a criminal sexual offence^* ed from the Service an;purified the public of[^ nrisoner 20s. Tha-*-'" dicate that Jthp-* B*'8 *' . a breach* P fr "* that a,-.*"
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19080516.2.30.3
Bibliographic details
NZ Truth, Issue 152, 16 May 1908, Page 5
Word Count
208Page 5 Advertisements Column 3 NZ Truth, Issue 152, 16 May 1908, Page 5
Using This Item
See our copyright guide for information on how you may use this title.