Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PUTATIVE PATERNITY.

MARY'S LITTLE LAMB.

Baa Baa Black Sheep Brown.

Why Didn't he Marry the Girl.

In the Wellington Magistrate's Court on Wednesday last the woes of Mary Phil- 1 lips were paraded with much solemnity before Mr W.G. Riddell. S.M. In December, 1905, Mary was a waitress and assistant-barmaid.' at the Wairau Valley Hotel. Mary is neither a beauty nor a chicken. She is ; an undersized tart of quite thirty winters. Nevertheless, her charms ensnared ia farm laborer named Harry Brown, two or- three years younger than herself, who, after a fortnight of acquaintanceship, offered to marry her. and was graciously accepted. Mary stayed at the ,-Wairau Valley for five weeks m all, and m that time, she avers, the bashful Brown frequently overcame her maidenly modesty. Mary' subsequently had a holiday, and during her absence the love lorn Brown languished exceedingly, although he tried to keep his pecker up by WRITING AMOROUS LETTERS !to her. In March, 1906, he got her a job at the Commercial Hotel, so she I went there for three months. But fortune frowned on Harry, for circumsta_ T I ces had taken him fifty miles away m the country, and he was unable to consolo himself with even a single glimpse of his beloved during all that time. Then the marriage-seeking Mary shifted her quarters to the Empire pub. at Blenheim, and Harry managed to come m once a week, staying from Saturday to Monday, the inevitable happening. Being of a rather wayward disposition, Mary once again shifted her quarters m September, 1906. going to the Grosvenor Hotel, Grovetown, near Blenheim, for five months. In the first week m February, 1907, Mary returned to Wellington, but at the end of June discovered that she was going to become a mother, so', accompanied by her mother, sjie went to Blenheim to see her lover. He was found at Spring Creek, where he said he would meet her on the^following Saturday and give her money to buy a ring,' adding that he would marry her. Brown did not keep j his appointment, so Mary went to Lawyer McNab, at Blenheim. Brown, Mary, her mother,, and the lawyer next assembled at the latter private house and Mr McNab questioned the now hesitating; Brown, who confessed his undue familiarity with Mary, and who,'according to the spinster, said he intended to marry her, but was not then m a position to take that serious step. Afterwards bashful Brown sent her. a medical book, but she burnt it. The child^ was born on November 6, 1907. Mary had been m a nursing home for 13 weeks before that, : where an operation had to be performed on her, and altogether the expenses amounted to £44 18s, nnd receipts were produced to show she had paid the expenses herself. Harry didn't bel'eve m shelling out money m this line, so Mary enlisted, the services of lawyer Peacock. In cross-examination by Mr P. W. Jackson, who appeared for Brown, the love-lorn lass denied that she hnd told Brown it was physically impossible for her to Rive birth to „a child. She was also positive at the interview m Mr McNab's house, Brown had SAID. HE WOULD, MARRY HER. although Mr McNab-, m his evidence taken at Blenheim, had said Brown had point-blank refused to do anything of the sort. During the time she was m Marlborough., she had misconducted with defendant about eighteen or twenty times. In corroboration of complainant's story Mr McNab's account of the interview at his house was handed m. Defendant then went into the witnessbox and swore that he had pnly attempted' liberties with Mary once or twice at Wairau Valley. ' He denied that the child was his, and declared that at Mr McNab's house he had refused absolutely to marry the woman, because he was not the child's father. Unfortunately for Brown, he- cot tangled up considerably m cross-examination by Mr Peacock. ' The latter produced some amatory epistles and asked him .if they were written by him. After studying them for several moments, Brown declared they were not written by him. Mr Peacock then got him to write down' an extract from one of the letters, and compared it with the others, upon which Brown acknowledged the authorship. These very affectionate missives had a nuriiber of crosses at the foot of each, but defendant said, m answer to a question from counsel, that .he was not aware what they meant. Mary had put them on her letters to him, so he just frllowed suit. The beak, with a smile, remarked that there could be little doubt what the crosses meant. Then the luckless wight was questioned concerning the medical book before alluded to. Some bloke, he replied/ brought it from Australia, and gave it to him to look at. and Mary took it out of his pocket. He did not show it to her, aud never had any intention of doing so. One of the letters mentioned gave him away, for m it he had told

HIS "DARK-HAIRED ANGEL" that he had got a small medical book from Australia and was going to send it to her. The subject of the book was then left behind, and the. -hapless Harry breathed a sigh of relief. He infermed Mr Peacock that he had never intended to marry the donah, and this brought more trouble on his head. In a letter dated January 29th, 1906, a few weeks after he first met the modest maiden, he made an allusion that, was unmistakably to marriage. He got further into tlie ,bog/ by asserting that he had only put that m the letter "to fill the paper up." He meant nothing by writing m that strain ; m fact, he wrote like that to everybody.

Mr Riddell remarked that either Brown's memory was very defective, or else he. was not telling the truth. Sufficient corroborative evidence had been given, and defendant must be adjudged the putative father of the child, and ordered to pay 7s a week towards its support. As regards the £44 18s incurred by complainant, the law did not entitle him to allow her that, but defendant would have to pay birth expenses to £10 10s, and law costs £2 2s. Brown was further ordered to find security for compliance, with the order, himself m a bond of £60. •and two sureties of £30 each. As he resided at Blenheim, he was allowed a fortnight to find the security, on condition that he reported himself to the Blenheim police once a week. The alternative to finding security was fixed at two months m quod.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19080411.2.39

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 147, 11 April 1908, Page 6

Word Count
1,105

PUTATIVE PATERNITY. NZ Truth, Issue 147, 11 April 1908, Page 6

PUTATIVE PATERNITY. NZ Truth, Issue 147, 11 April 1908, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert