Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TAXATION AND MONOPOLY.

TQ THE EDITOB.

Sir,— ln the report of the Wellington Industrial Association, as read at a meeting on Tuesday evening,, referring to factories it says : "The Committee, thinks it wxmld be well if copies -of the reports of • visiting ConiTnittees were sent to every member of the House of Representatives. This, m future will be done. By thus drawing, the attention of Parliamentary representatives to the important industries m the colony • members may be brought to see the, absolute necessity of something bei-a?. done m the way of hiefcter protection through the medium of the Cuioms tariff." Immediately following ihis the report says : "The Association is m no way an advocate for straight out Protect-km; but on account of the many anomolies existing m the Customs tariff many of our important industries are severely handicapped and some m a languishing condition."' If this is not asking for further straight out Protection, what is it ? Why should copies of tlie reports be sent only to Parliamentary repre- i sentatives ? Why should they not be distributed broadcast among the people, so that they may have a chance < of discussing and advising their representatives on the matter ? We are pretty well full of Protection at ' present. Take boots for instance j | (one of the most important items to j i workers, and families) which, not- J withstanding the heavy duty of, I think, 40 per cent., are reported to j be 25 to 50 per cent, or more dearer m Wellington than m Sydney. Foi- j j lowing on the report says: "In face [ v of the high rents and rates' which i have to be' paid by manufacturers the articles which are capable of being made m the colony should have reasonable protection," What is reasonable protection? Is it not more than resonable now?*" The -discussion at the meeting was a genieral plea for more protection. Do riot the workers pay high rents and taxes ? Are they not entitled to a rise m wages if further protection is i granted ? It is all nonsense to say trade is, languishing for want of protection Look at the large palacelike business premises and • private residences recently and now being erected by those said-to-be hard-up manufacturers. Docs this show that business m any branch is languishing? Not much. It is the workers who suffer. For every. Is a day wages ha*ve gone up manufacturers and merchants have been obtaining pounds by wav of protection, and what the laborer has gained m wages he has had to pay back m taxation. Yet Liberal politicians will greet tlie worker with the expression, "We are of the people and for the people." This is a wrong scheme for taxation.— l am, &c, . COLONIST. Sept-ember 27, '06.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTR19061006.2.49.1

Bibliographic details

NZ Truth, Issue 68, 6 October 1906, Page 8

Word Count
461

TAXATION AND MONOPOLY. NZ Truth, Issue 68, 6 October 1906, Page 8

TAXATION AND MONOPOLY. NZ Truth, Issue 68, 6 October 1906, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert