Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT STEALING

ACQUIRING HUSBAND’S CASH WOMEN APPLAUD VERDICT. BOSTON, August 24. Women applauded vigorously to-day when the court decided that when a wife takes money from her husband’s pockets she is not guilty of larceny. And, having gone,so far, the court decided to do the thing properly. After all, it said, a till or cash register was but ahotber pocket so far as a wife is concerned, and therefore a wife is no more guilty when she oiqjties her husband’s cash register than when she empties his pockets. .... These findings to-day resulted in Mrs Hetty Lang leaving the court all smiles and Lang uttering language; which all but sent him back to court as defendant instead of prosecutor.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19260910.2.52

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12548, 10 September 1926, Page 6

Word Count
118

NOT STEALING New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12548, 10 September 1926, Page 6

NOT STEALING New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12548, 10 September 1926, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert