PRIVY COUNCIL
EMPIRE’S ULTIMATE COURT LENGTHY LIST FROM NEW ZEALAND. At present there are pending an un. usual number of appeals to the Privy Council from Now Zealand Court- decisions. On ihe average not more than two or three cases go forward from New Zealand each year to the ultimate tribunal in England. At the present time, however, there are no fewer than eight cases going forward, amongst which are the following: Lysnar v. Gisborne Harbour Board; Long v. Barker. an Auckland will case; The King v. The Crown Milling Company and Distributors, Ltd., and others, in connection with the alleged flonrmilling trust j Wright v. Morgan; Bossett v. Wilkiqson, a case of rescission of contract; Gardin;r v. Te Poru and others, arising out of a native lease case; Cleave v. McDonald; and Manawatu Drainage Board v. Tremaine. In a number of these cases. Mr M. Mvers, K.C., will appear for one or ether of the parties, and leaves for England in March. Mr Gresson, K.C., of Christchurch, will also appear.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19260129.2.38
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12357, 29 January 1926, Page 6
Word Count
171PRIVY COUNCIL New Zealand Times, Volume LIII, Issue 12357, 29 January 1926, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in