“NOTHING TO ANSWER"
SYDNEY DIVORCE ACTION. CO-RESPONDENT’S CASE. By Telegraph—Press Assn. —Copyright. (Received November 22, 8.30 p.m.) SYDNEY, November 22. In the Negozio divorce case counsel for the co-respondent, Vital), protested against the opprobrious epithets used regarding his client, and explained that he did not put him into the witness-box because there was nothing to answer, and lie took the entire responsibility for the step. •Counsel claimed that petitioner’s ohief grievance was not against his wife, but because of his being displaced by Vitali in an important and lucrative agency business.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19231123.2.57
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume L, Issue 11684, 23 November 1923, Page 5
Word Count
91“NOTHING TO ANSWER" New Zealand Times, Volume L, Issue 11684, 23 November 1923, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.