Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STEP-GRANDCHILDREN

RIGHTS UNDER. SUCCESSION. APPEAL FROM”DEATH DUTY. If a widow, leaving property to the grandchildren of her deceased husband by a former wife, are such grandchildren to be treated as successors, for the purpose of succession duty, or, are they to bo treated as grandchildren of the deceased widow ? This question was submitted for the optimum of the Supreme Court yesterday in a case in which the parties were Dr. Phillip Oswald Andrew, of Ohaewai, who was the appellant, and the Commissioner of Stamp Duties, who was joined to the issue as respondent. The case was heard before fiis Honour Mr Justice Sim, Acting-Chief Justice. Mr P. B. Cooks and Mr T. C. A. Hislop appeared for the appellant, and Mr W. C. MacGregor, K.C. (-Solicitor-General), for the Commissioner. DETAILS OF THE WILL. On January 4th, 1920, Emily Sarah Andrew, late of' Wellington, widow, died, probate of her will being granted to the appellant. The residue of the estate was to be divided equally -between her several step-grandchildren, being the . grandchildren of her late husband, Rev. John Chapman Andrew. The grandchildren were in, no way related by blood to the deceased. The residue amounted to .£45,960 16s lOd. The succession duty i was assessed at <£4596 Is Bd, being at the rate of 10 ppr cent. The appellant obj ected to the assessment, on the ground that, in the Death Duties Act, unless a contrary intention appeared, "child includes a step-child.” and the beneficiaries to the present will ; should have been treated as grandchildren, within the meaning of the Finance Act, 1915, and the duty assessed at 2 per cent. The Solicitor-General argued that the statute gave power to the appellant to bring himself within the exemption; it was not for the Crown to show that they did not come within it. , His Honour reserved judgment.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19210811.2.7

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume XLVII, Issue 10976, 11 August 1921, Page 2

Word Count
306

STEP-GRANDCHILDREN New Zealand Times, Volume XLVII, Issue 10976, 11 August 1921, Page 2

STEP-GRANDCHILDREN New Zealand Times, Volume XLVII, Issue 10976, 11 August 1921, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert