A London contemporary has been in. viting its readers to submit what each considers to bo an ideal music-hall pro- • gramme. The answers have, naturally, been ns varied as the tastes of the contributors to the discussion. As the proverb says, one man's meat is another's poison, and, fortunately .for managers, the public is wont to reveal a wide divergence in the matter of entertainment. Still, the controversy makes interesting reading. But. now comes the “Performer," minded to look on the practical side of the question. “We have made inquiries of exports,” it says, “and have had estimates of from .€I6OO to .£2OOO a week for a bill” such as the majority iof these idealists have drawn up! Clearjly you cannot run a music-hall on theoretical lines and make it pay.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19101223.2.128.19
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7318, 23 December 1910, Page 4 (Supplement)
Word Count
131Untitled New Zealand Times, Volume XXXII, Issue 7318, 23 December 1910, Page 4 (Supplement)
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.