DECISION RESERVED
CHARGE AGAINST A TEACHER. THE QUESTION OF CORPORAL PUNISHMENT. (Special to tho “Times/') AUCKLAND, September U-. An important principle is involved in tho case which caiuo before the Uneivunga Court to-day, ’ when Air Mclntosh, headmaster, was charged with assaulting a pupil who was alleged td have been unduly caned. Counsel for the parents. Air Brookfield, contended that the administration of corporal punishment should be confined to deliberate breaches of discipline or wilful fault. What (asked Air Brookheld) was this boy's wilful fault? He was not there when the bell rang. If the master had given only one stroke he would have been guilty of an assault. He did not a-sk tho boy wfty he was late, but commanded that those who were late should stand out to receive punishment. It was tho duty of a master to find out why the boy was late, and whether he had a good reason for being late. This was not done, and therefore the punishment was unjust from beginning to end.
For the defence Dr Bamford urged that the schoolmaster being entitled to punish, the extent of the punishment .must be loft to his discretion. If a parent kept a child late he must Bend a note or the schoolmaster was entitled to punish. In this cose it was clear that the master believed this boy to be one of those who had been cribbing playtime.
His Worship: Do you mean to say that if men come here and don't say anything T am simply to understand them guilty and proceed to punish them? We ask them to plead, and if they don't plead we explain what plonrlm* moans, and tlmse are men, not boys. Dr Bamford: Yes. because the procedure of the Court is definitely laid down, and tho AUeistrnto is not a wit11P,C* of fact as fh« schoolmaster is. ITis \Aorslun- Whatever I do in tho matter I want to be able to lay down a principle. Wo aro roallv considering onr fnlnre men and woe-eu. not tide narficnlar boy or this particular teachor. It seems to mo that it ivonld be very hard on youngsters if they were nnnisWl and not any inouiry mad-' I realise that them is a considerable want of parental control.
His Worship intimated that bo would reserve his decision.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM19080915.2.78
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Times, Volume XXX, Issue 6625, 15 September 1908, Page 7
Word Count
386DECISION RESERVED New Zealand Times, Volume XXX, Issue 6625, 15 September 1908, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Times. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.