Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INJUSTICE TO COLONIAL ENTERPRISE.

TO THE EDITOR OP THE NEW ZEALAND TIMES, Sir, —-Permit me the honor of indicating an anomaly and an inconsistency connected with a branch of colonial production, which “ goes its own length ” in exposing the difficulties realised by the capitalist in fostering the growth of manufacture in the colonies, and obstacles to be surmounted by the colonial producer before he may expect to “stand upon an equal platform ” with his Home rival For instance, the London “ Market price ” for a certain class' of paper is 225. 4d. per cwt. The Sydney “market price” for-the same article is 255. Bd. (this quotation covers a “ specific duty ” of 3s. 4d. per cwt.) Paper-makers in the old country invoice the same to the colonies at 18s. per cwt., whereas the colonial manufacturer invoices at 20s. per cwt., being 2s. in excess of his rival. When an English consignment passes through the New Zealand Customs, it pays duty on the minimum, i.e., 18s.; but when a New South Wales consignment is submitted for the same ordeal, it must pay duty on the maximum, i.e., 255. Bd. (which includes the Sydney duty of 3s. 4d.) ’By this peculiar and special “ customs process ” the British manufacturer gets the “whip hand” over his less favored competitor, and thus the colonial maker is effectually “ shut out of his market.” Now, if English paper makers pass their goods at “ manufacturing rates,” how is it that the colonial makers must pass their goods at “ market rates?" In all fairness to the colonial, he ought to enjoy the same amenities as his rival, otherwise he will be forced nolens nolens by the nature of the glaring discrepancy to secure another market for this branch of manufacture, which may (by the law of supply and demand) entail greater loss to the buyer than to the manufacturer of an article commanding (as it does) so “ready sales.” —I am, &c., Geo. Murray.

Paper works, Liverpool, New South Wales, Nov., 1876.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZTIM18761124.2.12

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4891, 24 November 1876, Page 2

Word Count
331

INJUSTICE TO COLONIAL ENTERPRISE. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4891, 24 November 1876, Page 2

INJUSTICE TO COLONIAL ENTERPRISE. New Zealand Times, Volume XXXI, Issue 4891, 24 November 1876, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert