SUPREME COURT—IN BANCO.

New Zealand Times, Volume XXIX, Issue 4198, 3 September 1874, Page 3

SUPREME COURT—IN BANCO.

Wkdnesdat, September 2. (Before His Honor Mr. Justice Johnston.) • , PEAT V. MCKENZIE. This action has already been before the Court on several occasions. ' At this stage the defendant had applied to have an injunction set aside on the ground that a purchaser for valuable consideration and innocent of fraud was injuriously affected by it, and obtained a rule nisi, which he now moved should be made absolute. The Attorney-General, instructed by Mr. Moorhouse, appeared for tho plaintiff, and Mr. Travers for the defendant. It appeared by Mr. Travers' argument that the defendant relied upon a point which was not raised by the rule nisi. The AttorneyGeneral therefore ppposed the introduction of any question which had not been fully indicated in manner prescribed by the Supreme Court rules. His Honor held with the latter, and ordered the rule to be discharged with costs. BOY AND OTHBK3 V. LVOX AND AUOTHBR. This was a disputed question as ,to the E roper execution of the trusts of a will, and ; as now been before the Court for a considerable period. Arbitrators had been appointed, and the plaintiff moved for a decree upon thenaward. Mr. Travers appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Brandon for the defendant. Terms'of decree and for payment of casts were made by His Honor.