Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS.

TO THE EDITOR.

g lßj —i have to thank you most sincerely for the very full, clear and graphic report of my conversation with your representative on Saturday week. As a whole the report is the most accurate I can remember, speaking from an experience of many interviews and interviewers. The two or three slips which I note are no doubt entirely due to the short time at our disposal, and the speed with which I was consequently obliged to speak. I now ask leave to trespass on your courtesy while I correct them. (1) It was not the Argus but the South Australian Register which published the surprising statement that New Zealand had lost 1700 on the arrivals and departures of November. The Argus' assertions about our loss of population were general. (2) The record of human beings lately put on the soil in South Australia is not " between five and six thousand in a few months/' but that number in three years. They are made up of 1157 homestead " blockers," representing between 3000 and 4000 souls, and the population of" 2000 correctly stated by you as being in the Murray Co-operative Settlements.

These last mentioned have literally been placed on the soil within a few months, but the remarkable increase in the number of "blockers" is spread over the period between the middle of 1891 and the middle of 1894.

(3) In speaking of the coupons used by the settlers in the co-operative associations, I should have said 15s instead of 10s 6d. I had no opportunity of referring to my notes either before or during our conversation, and that is my excuse for misleading you on this point. Permit me to add that I quite agree with the general tenor of your leading article of Monday as to there being a lesson of hope to be learned from village settlements in Australia.

If I don't take as high an estimate as you of the promising figures in Victoria and New South,Wales, on,the other hand there are the older homestead settlements in South Australia previous to 1891 to be taken into account, so that it is as broad as it is long, and your argument holds good. —I am, &c,

W. P. Beeves,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18950111.2.99.1

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Mail, Issue 1193, 11 January 1895, Page 33

Word Count
377

VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1193, 11 January 1895, Page 33

VILLAGE SETTLEMENTS. New Zealand Mail, Issue 1193, 11 January 1895, Page 33

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert