LIBEL ACTION IN DUNEDIN.
(UNITED PKES3 ASSOCIATION.) Dunedin, March 21. The Supreme Court was occupied all day in hearing a libel case, Sutherland v. Neill. The plaintiff had been a warder in the Seacliff Lunatic Asylum, of which defendant is medical superintendent. The libel consisted in the defendant having caused a letter to be written to the Superintendent of the Auckland Asylum, stating that plaintiff had been dismissed for “gross insolence and insubordination.” It appeared from the evidence that the plaintiff and another wardsman had written to Dr Neill stating that, in their opinion, he had neglected a patient named Cook, and they would lay the matter before the authorities for investigation. On receipt of this letter Dr Neill dismissed the two warders who had signed it, and caused letters to be written to the superintendents of other institutions, intimating the dismissal and grounds for it. It was submitted that the communications were privileged, and with this hi 3 Honor agreed. Under the circumstances it wa3 necessary to prove malice, and he thought, if the jury believed the warders, they might perhaps find something in their evidence which would support the idea of malice. The jury found that the letter was written maliciously, and gave a verdict for the plaintiff for £5 and costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18870325.2.114
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Mail, Issue 786, 25 March 1887, Page 23
Word Count
214LIBEL ACTION IN DUNEDIN. New Zealand Mail, Issue 786, 25 March 1887, Page 23
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.