R. M. COURT, FEATHERSTON.
(Before H. Wardell, Eeq, R.M.) Constable Hargood v H. Burling, sen.— The defendant was charged with having left a working bullock with a dislocated leg for some days ’ without food or water. The Resident Magistrate said that he was glad the information had been laid, but did not consider the evidence sufficient to warrant a conviction. He therefore dismissed the case. Same r D. C. M‘Bougal.—Defendant was charged with using threatening and abusive
language. Fined 10s, and ordered into recognizance to keep the peaoe for three months. _ Martin v SPDougal.-—Debt, £35 16s sd. Judgment for £8 I6s 5d and costs. • Taylor v M'Dougal.—Debt, £9 7a 6d. Judgment for amount and costs. Tully v Cundy.—Claim, £l, for possession of house, &c. Settled. Same v Same.—Claim, £5 for rent. Judgment for amount and costs.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZMAIL18730222.2.18
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Mail, Issue 107, 22 February 1873, Page 5
Word Count
136R. M. COURT, FEATHERSTON. New Zealand Mail, Issue 107, 22 February 1873, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in