Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WOMAN'S COURT DEBUT

FIGHTS OWN CASE OPPOSED BY KING'S COUNSEL "CHANCERY COURT MANNER" [FROM OUR OWN CORRKSI'OXDENT] LONDON. Jan. 21 For four clays a young married woman who had never been in a Court of law, oven in tho public gallery, lias appeared with distinction as her o\vn advocate in the Chancery Division, London, at the present sessions. Opposing her was distinguished King's Counsel, Mr. 11. F. Roxburgh, representing an important building society, yet so well did the defendant, Mrs. E. F. E. Borders, of West Wickham, Kent, present her case that she raised a number of points described by the Judge as of great importance to building society members throughout the countiy. Mrs. Borders contested an action brought by tho Bradford Thihl Equitable) Building Society to obtain possession of the house she occupied on the ground that she was three months in arrear with repayments. Mrs. Borders denied the arrears and alleged that she had been fraudulently misled by tho society into the belief that the house complied with local authority requirements, whereas actually there were structural defects. She counter-claimed for £B2l. Documents Not Produced

Tho case first, attracted attention when Mrs. Borders claimed that only certain letters written by her to the society had been produced. A number of letters were subsequently handed to her by the society's solicitor, whereupon the Judge, Mr. Justice Bennett, said: "It is a matter for very grave comment that these letters were not 'discovered' before. The plaintiffs make an affidavit of documents and do not disclose half of them. It is indefensible." He thereupon adjcnirned the hearing to enable Mrs. Borders to examine the letteni.

At a later stjige Mrs. Borders was on her feet for practically a whole day arguing her case and replying to observations made by opposing counsel. She claimed an injunction to restrain the society from making further advances until all its present properties were put into repair. The Judge considered this point of wide importance and fixed a date a fortnight hence to hear her submissions on it. No Knowledge of Law People with lengthy legal experience say that she has the perfect Chancery Court manner—quiet, imperturbable, instant in reply, tenacious and never at a loss for a fact. "I got all my experience from listening to Mr. Roxburgh on the other side," she said. "I know nothing of tho law. I am relying entirely on the" facts. The case, is taking a great deal of time, but last week-end I had to put itiaside for a while and do some washing." When the case was adjourned for a fortnight the Judge suggested that it might be well for Mrs. Borders to take legal advice on ijome of the abstruse matters of law tliat had emerged from a difficult and involved case.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19380223.2.7.4

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXV, Issue 22970, 23 February 1938, Page 5

Word Count
465

WOMAN'S COURT DEBUT New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXV, Issue 22970, 23 February 1938, Page 5

WOMAN'S COURT DEBUT New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXV, Issue 22970, 23 February 1938, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert