RIGHT TO HOLIDAY
" DISMISSED WORKER
QUESTION FOR APPEAL COURT
[nv telegraph—press association] "\VF,LLIXC. TOX. Tucsday
The Court of Appeal was to-day engaged in hchring a case stated by Mr. Justice o'Regan for its opinion on questions of law. The inspector of factories, New Plymouth, brought an action for a penalty of £lO for an alleged breach by the Cardiff Co-operative Dairy Company. Limited, of Taranaki, of the creameries, cheese and butter factories employees' industrial agreement, 15)34, as allegedly altered ot amended by part two of the Finance Act, 1936. It was claimed that when the company terminated a worker's employment it failed to allow him a proportionate amount of holiday 011 full pay. as provided for in the award of 1930.
The questions for the opinion of the Court of Appeal are: (1) Whether under and within the meaning of section 15 (3) of the Finance Act, 1930 (which restored IO.'H rates of pay) tlie industrial agreement of 1931 is in substitution or replacement of the award of 15)30; (2) if so, whether the worker, by virtue of section 15 (3) is entitled to holiday pay provided for in the award of 1930. The Court reserved its judgment.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19371006.2.156
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22852, 6 October 1937, Page 16
Word Count
198RIGHT TO HOLIDAY New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIV, Issue 22852, 6 October 1937, Page 16
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.