Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DEBT TO FATHER

BANKRUPTCY CLAIM SON DEFENDS PETITION CREDITOR'S ACTION FAILS [IIY TKLKCmArn —OWN cohkkspondent] PALMKRSTON NORTH, Thursday A judgment of interest was delivered on behalf of Mr. Justice Blair in the Palmcrston North Supreme Court today, in which His Honor declined to declare bankrupt a debtor against whom an order for payment of a debt had been obtained by bis father. The action originated when David Proiise, farmer, of Longburn, obtained judgment for £l3B 18s in the Magistrate's Court at Palmerston North against his son, Oliver Prouse, farmer, of Longburn. Tlio matter had been twice before the Courts, once before the Magistrate's Court, when the magistrate gave judgment in favour of tho debtor, ahd again before the Supreme Court on appeal, when Mr. Justice Ostler said that though lie regretted it, tlio law was such that judgment would bo given against tho debtor. Tho case was returned to the Magistrate's Court to have judgment accordingly entered. David Prouso then petitioned to have Oliver Prouso mado bankrupt and the matter came boforo the registrar in tho absence of the Judge at Palmerston North on July 3, when the debtor, for whom Mr. M. Onglev appeared, opposed tho petition. The registrar adjourned the matter to the next sitting of the Supremo Court. Tho petition eanio beforo Mr. Justice Blair at tho last sitting at Palmerston North. After hearing legal argument His Honor reserved his decision, which was delivered to-day. "1 ain by 110 means satisfied that tho judgment creditor, in seeking an order for adjudication against his son, is acting bona fide," tlio judgment said. "I am quite unable to appreciate what benefit the petitioning creditor hopes to obtain. I can see none.

"1 have verified tho fact that the judgment given by Mr. Justice Ostler on the appeal from tho magistrate's judgment in favour of the debtor was based 011 a technicality, and the merits of the petitioning creditor's claim are all with tho debtor," His Honor added. "The authorities quoted to me by INIr. Onglev show that in a case circumstanced as this is, tho Court may look behind tho debt. Tho petition is dismissed."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19361002.2.97

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22539, 2 October 1936, Page 12

Word Count
356

DEBT TO FATHER New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22539, 2 October 1936, Page 12

DEBT TO FATHER New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22539, 2 October 1936, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert