Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EMPLOYERS CRITICISED

SOCIAL JUSTICE ATTITUDE LABOUR DELEGATE RETURNS [BY TELEGRAPH PRESS ASSOCIATION] CHRISTCHURCH, Wednesday Strong criticism of the actions of the employers, and of the British Government for its uncompromising attitude on the question of social justice, was voiced by Mr. G. T. Thurston on his return to Christ-church from Geneva, where he attended the International Labour Conference as the delegate for the workers of New Zealand. "The thing that impressed me was that almost invariably the employers did everything in their power to prevent the improvement of social conditions," he said. "This was done not only by voting, but also by needlessly absorbing the time of the conference." He added that, in his opinion, the employers were putting up a losinp fight. "Since the inauguration of the International Labour Office, in 1919, 49 conventions have been registered," Mr. Thurston added. "When a State ratifies the convention it enters into a compact to maintain, by legislation or otherwise, certain specific conditions of labour. Strange as it seems, New Zealand has not yet ratified one singlp convention.

"The workers and the employers in New Zealand should take a livelier interest in the work of this great machine. In many cases our laws do not provide the conditions implied in the International Labour Conventions, and our previous Government seems to have ignored almost entirely the treaty to which it was a party. Little or no discussion takes place in New Zealand on matters pertaining to the Labour Conventions, and I feel it is my duty to place the question before the Government, and to ask that these matters should be referred either to the Labour Bills Committee, or to soirio special committee of the House of Representatives."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19361001.2.173

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22538, 1 October 1936, Page 16

Word Count
285

EMPLOYERS CRITICISED New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22538, 1 October 1936, Page 16

EMPLOYERS CRITICISED New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXIII, Issue 22538, 1 October 1936, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert