SEATS RETAINED
GOVERNMENT PARITIES MR. ANTHONY EDEN RETURNED PETERBOROUGH Lord Burghley (Con.) . . . . 22,677 Ernest Davies (Lab.) . . . . 17)373 Election, 1931. —Lord Bitrghloy (Con.), 26,640; Mr. J. P. Horrnbin (Lab.), 14,206. WARWICK AND LEAMINGTON Anthony Eden (Con.) . . . . 35,746 J. Perry (Lab.) 10,930 Election, 1931.—Mr. Anthony Eden (Con.), 38,58-1; Mr. C. G. Garton (Lab.), 9261. SPEN VALLEY Sir John Simon (Nat. Lib.) . . 21,671 Ivor Thomas (Lab.) 21,029 Election, 1931.—Sir John Simon (Nat.Lib.), 28,647; Mr. H. H. Elvin (Lab.), 15,691. DAVENTRY Captain E. A.Fitzßoy (Speaker) 18,934 J. F. Barnes (Lab.) . . . . 10,767 Election, 1931,—Captain E. A. Fitzßoy (Con.), unopposed. EPPING Winston Churchill (Con.) . . 34,849 Sharp (Lib.) 14,430 J" Hanger (Lab.) . . . . . . 9,758 Election, 1931.—Mr. Winston Churchill (Con.), 35,956; Mr. A. S. Comyns Carr (Lib.), 15,670; Mr. J. Ranger (Lab.), 4713. ISLINGTON NORTH A. W. Goodman (Con.) . . . . 20,744 R. S. Young (Lab.) 17,359 Election, 1931.—Miss Thelma Cazalet (Con.), 27,221; Mrs L. Manning (Lab.), 13,111. ST. PANORAS NORTH Sir lan Fraser (Con.) . . . . 16,888 Tibbies (Lab.) . . ...... 13,287 Half (Lib.) 1,259 Election, 1931.—Mr. Lan Fraser (Con.), 22,490; Mr. J. Marley (Lab.), 12,257; Mr. W. G. Shepherd (Comm.), 456. EAST DORSET G. R. Hall Caine (Con.) . . . . 25,520 Raffety (Lib.) 11,349 E. J, Stocker (Lab.) . . . . 10,822 Election, 1931.—Mr. G. R. Hall Caine (Con,), 20,711; Mr. A. E. Glassey (Nat.Lib.), 18,801; Mr. E. ,7. Stocker (Lab.), 7009. DOVER Major J, J. Astor (Con.)' t . 25,884 Bennett (Lab.) 14,588 Election, 1931.—Major J. J. Astor (Con.), 29,743; Mr. W. Moore (Lab.), 9781. FROME Mrs. M. C. Tate (Con.) . * . 19,684 Mackay (Lab.) .. . . .. 18,690 Hopkins (Lib.) 4,177 Election, 1931. Viscount Weymouth (Con.), 24,838; .Mr. F. Gould (Lab.), 17,748. CARDIFF CENTRAL Sir Ernest Bennett (Nat. Lab.) 16,954 Dugdale (Lab.) 12,094 Glanville-Brown (Lib.) . . . . 3,863 Election, 193].—Sir E. Bennett (Nat.Lab.), 2-1,120; Mr. E. Archbold (Lab.), 10,758. NORTH NORFOLK T. A. Cook (Con.) 17,863 Lady Noel-Buxton (Lab.) . . 14,465 Election, 1931. —Mr. T. A. Cook (Con.), 19,988; Lady Noel-Buxton (Lab,), 13,035. FAREHAM Sir Thomas Inskip (Con.)' . . 31,794 Mack (Lab.) 10,561 Election, 1931.—Sir T. Inskip (Con.), unopposed. HILLHEAD (GLASGOW) Sir Robert Horne (Con.) . . 18,367 McCulloch (Lab.) 8,566 Election, 1931.—Sir R. Horne (Con.), 21,279; Mr. C. A. O'Donnell (Lab.), 7539. KINROSS AND WESTERN Duchess of Atholl (Con.) . . 15,238 Mrs. C. Mac Donald (Lib.) . . 10,009 Election, 1931. —Duchess of Atholl (Con.), 16,228; Mr. T. A. Robertson (Lib.), 10,533. EAST RENFREW Marquess of Clydesdale (Con.) 35,121 Barr (Lab.) 21,475 Brown (Scot. Nat.) . . . . 6,593 Election, 1931.—Marquees of Clydesdale (Con.), 27,740; Mr. J. Strain (Lab.), 12,477; Mr. W. O. Brown (Ind.). 6498. KELVINGROVE (GLASGOW) W. E. Elliot (Con.). .. 15,100 McNeil (Lab.) ~ . < .. 14,951 Rae (Lib.) . . . . . . . . 1,004 Mr. Elliot had a majority of only two over Mr. McNeil at the first, count, but after a recount he was declared elected by a majority of 149. Election, 1931.—Mr. W. E. Elliot (Con.), 21,481; Air. J. Winning (Lab.), 12,415, OXFORD UNIVERSITY (Two Members) Lord Hugh Cecil (Con.) ~ 7,365 A. P. Herbert (Ind. Nat.) . . 5,206 Cruttwell (Con.) 3,697 Stocks (Lab.) 2,776 Election, 1931.—Lord Hunh Cecil (Con.) and Sir Charles Oman (Con.) were returned unopposed, OTHER PARTIES THE LLOYD GEORGE FAMILY CARNARVON D. Llovd George (Ind. Lib.) . . 19,242 Du Cros (Con.) 9,633 Election, 1931.—Mr. D. Lloyd George (Ind.-Lib.). 17,101; Mr. F. P. Gourley (Con.), 11,714.
ANGLESEY Miss Megan Lloyd George (Ind. Lib) .. .. .. .. .. 11,227 Williams (Con.) 7,045 Henry Jones (Lab.) 6,959 Election, 1931.—Miss M. Lloyd George (Ind.-Lib.), 14.839; Mr. A. Hughes (Con.), 10,012. PEMBROKE Maj. Gwilym Lloyd George (lnd. Lib.) Allison (Con.) 15,660 Jenkins (Lab.) . . . . . . ••• 12,341 Election, 1931.—Maior G. Lloyd George (Ind.-Lib.), 21,000; Major C. W. M, Price (Con.), 19,500. GORBALS (GLASGOW) G. Buchanan (1.L.P.) . . • • 22,860 M. Bloch (Con.) 5,824 Burnett (Lab.) 1,f86 Election. 1931.—Mr. G. Buchanan (Lab.), 19,278; Mr. M. Bloch (Con.), 11,264; Mr. H. McShane (Comm.), 2626. LABOUR MEMBERS MR. D. KIRKWOOD BACK DUMBARTON D. Kirkwood (Lab.) M. J. McCracken (Con.) . . . . 10,909 Election. 1931.-Mr. D. Kirkwood (Lab> ), 16,335; Mr. M. J. McCracken (Con.), 15,338. PLAJSTOW W. Thorne (Lab.) . . . . . . 1§,493 Miss Roddick (Con.) . . • • 6,730 Election, 1931.—Mr. Will Thorne (Lab.) ■was returned unopposed. " HAPPY ENGLAND" FRENCH PRESS COMMENT THE RESULT WELCOMED OTHER FOREIGN VIEWS (Received November 17, 5.5 p.m.) Times Cable LONDON, Nov. 16 The result of the general election in Britain is generally welcomed abroad. French newspapers remark that National Ministers usually are more modest in words and more effective in action than Labour Ministers, and express relief that France is to have a reasonably strong and united neighbour for the next few years. They pay a tribute to Mr. Baldwin as an architect of success and compliment the electorate on its decision, also on its orderliness and tolerance, which are regretfully compared with French political disturbances. Several French writers refer to " Happy England." Most of the newspapers pay tributes to British stability as revealed at the elections. Le Matin says: " In Europe are chaos and uncertainty. The British Isles are isles of the blest." The Berlin press expresses the opinion that the election result means that Britain will become even more authoritative at Geneva, where, when the time comes, the Voelkischer Beobachter thinks, she vill attempt the reorganisation of the League. The Berliner Tageblatt says it expects the Government to lead in the consolidation of British power at home and abroad. The Rome correspondent of the Times says the Government's success is generally welcomed as it is considered that a Labour success would have rendered more difficult the attempt to reach a settlement of the Abyssinian dispute which would be acceptable to Italy. However, it is emphasised that Mr. Eden is still a Minister. RANKS OF LABOUR LEADERS' DIFFERENCES (Received November 17. 8.45 p.m.) LONDON. Nov. 17 Other commentators discuss Labour's position. The Observer says that in spite of the party officially trying to pretend the result is satisfactory owing to the increased vote for Labour, the leaders are both dissatisfied and disunited. The moderates blame the Socialist League for frightening the Liberal vote, while Sir Stafford Cripps and his friends are saying that Mr. Herbert Morrison has turned a revolutionary movement into a harmless one, thus damping down the general enthusiasm. The Observer says it believes friction will increase, as Mr. Morrison is aiming at securing Liberal votes which are essential to Labour's future success. He will endeavour to broaden the movement until Sir Stafford and his followers are forced out.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19351118.2.69
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXII, Issue 22269, 18 November 1935, Page 11
Word Count
1,029SEATS RETAINED New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXII, Issue 22269, 18 November 1935, Page 11
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.