Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

TREES AT ROTORUA

Sir,—As a resident of Kotorua, there is, I think, more than one aspect of the case made out by one of our constant visitors in your issue of Tuesday last. The removal of the three trees from the vicinity of the Blue Baths was an absolute necessity. The new schejne now in course of construction—extra flowerbeds ancl improved parking area—could not otherwise have been proceeded with, and so numerous are the trees in this vicinity, that few would ever be aware of their removal. It is, however, more concerning the alleged mutilation of the plane trees near the bowling greens with which I am concerned. These trees, planted years ago, have reached a height of between 50ft. and 60ft. They stand between the top and middle of our bowling greens, the distance between the greens being some 47ft. I am assured by those better versed in tree culture than 1 that, from the tap roots the feeder roots will spread equivalent to the height of the tree, i.e.,. 50ft. to 60ft., all round. A system of deep trenching has kept the roots down to a certain extent on one of the greens, a course which is periodically necessary to allow the greens a chance. The Rotorua Bowling Club has a membership of some 150 players, and in addition we have the honour during the season to entertain some hundreds of bowlers from all parts of the Dominion and overseas. These bowlers contribute not an inconsiderable sum, doubtless used in the upkeep of greens and gardens. We therefore contend we have some small consideration due to any factor or factors operating against the enjoyment of the game, for which we pay. I say without doubt, the two plane trees under review are factors which detract from such enjoyment. Apart from the root damage previously mentioned, the confusing shadows across the green during any playing afternoon is another factor. The position at present is this: I was one of a deputation three who interviewed some of the head officers of the Tourist Department, and as'your correspondent is desirous of fixing responsibility I am prepared to accept my quota; indeed, would be delighted to. were the "mutilation" completed. At present, one tree has been cut back from the 50ft. to about 20ft.. but the other is half done, and there it stands, so that in the uncompleted job I am at one with your correspondent, who deplores the present appearance. The work was authorised by high officers in the Tourist Department, and stopped by someone at Wellington. With the completion of the cutting back the shade will, I am assured, be quite sufficient to protect from the "burning sun." Finally, to rush into print and talk of "mutilation," "hacking" and "vandalism," is likely to confuse many of our visitors, to whom our gardens have always been a source of enjoyment. Albert French.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19340921.2.175.7

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21911, 21 September 1934, Page 15

Word Count
482

TREES AT ROTORUA New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21911, 21 September 1934, Page 15

TREES AT ROTORUA New Zealand Herald, Volume LXXI, Issue 21911, 21 September 1934, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert