A NEGLECTED WAVE
Regarded by the judge at Northampton county court as of considerable importance to hairdressers and dentists, a recent case was adjourned in which a woman was sued for not fulfilling her appointment for a permanent wave. It was stated that she made no attempt to arrange a fresh date. A local hairdresser brought u claim for two guineas on the ground that the appointment amounted to a contract. Judge Drucquer adjourned the case in order to give the solicitor a chance of citing similar cases. He remarked that there might have been some cases decided which would be of assistance to plaintiff's contention, though it was doubtful, in view of the small amount involved, whether any had got as far as the House of Lords.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19330401.2.176.42
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LXX, Issue 21456, 1 April 1933, Page 3 (Supplement)
Word Count
128A NEGLECTED WAVE New Zealand Herald, Volume LXX, Issue 21456, 1 April 1933, Page 3 (Supplement)
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in