Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GRAZING RIGHTS.

CITY COUNCIL'S CHARGES. APPEAL BY A DEFENDANT. Interesting legal points were raised in an appeal against a Magistrate's Court decision, heard by Mr. Justice £mith yesterday. The appellant was John Raphael Lundon (Mr. Sullivan), who had been sued by the Auckland City Council for £l4 4s grazing fees, and lost the case. Against this decision the appeal was lodged. Mr. Sullivan stated that the appellant had been grazing a pony and a horse on the Mt. Hobson Domain for 3s a week, and the amount grew to £l4 4s. When he was sued his defence was that under sect-ion 55 of the Public Reserves, Domains and National Parks Act, 1928, before stock could be depastured on a domain or any charge made for depasturing a by-law should be made fixing the charges, and that by-law must have the approval of the Minister. No ,«uch by-law existed in this case. Appellant had paid for the grazing until he decided that the council had no right to make the charge. The council had been receiving money it had rio right to receive, contended counsel.

Mr. Stanton, for the City Council, said this was the case of a person who had deliberately taken his horses to an authority, asked to be allowed to graze them, kept them there for a period under an express promise to pay, and after a certain time ceased to pay. When claim was made for the unpaid money, life said there was no right at all to charge. He had had the benefit of the contract, but he was not going to pay. Counsel submitted that having accepted the contract it was not now open to Lundon to raise any question of informality. The council was empowered to make by-laws, but until it had done so it was open to it to make a contract in the ordinary way. The power to make bylaws did not interfere with the power that resided in it to make contracts. Mr. Sullivan submitted that his client was just in the position of the country yokel in Sydney to whom a stranger in the Domain had sold the sundial for £2O. When the yokel came to remove it he found the man had sold him something ho had not got. The council had sold his client something it had not got. His Honor reserved his decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19310721.2.123

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20930, 21 July 1931, Page 11

Word Count
396

GRAZING RIGHTS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20930, 21 July 1931, Page 11

GRAZING RIGHTS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVIII, Issue 20930, 21 July 1931, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert