Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHINA AND RUSSIA.

Hope of an amicable settlement of the dispute between China and Russia in connection with the Chinese Eastern Railway is considerably diminished by the latest action of the Nationalist Government. It has punished its envoys who negotiated a settlement, because they exceeded their authority and instructions, and has decided to send a delegate to Moscow for the reopening of the questions at issue. Included in its ground for action is the maintenance by Russia of a military force along the Manchurian border, in contravention of the understanding when it was agreed that the future policy of administering the railway should be a matter for unhampered friendly discussion. In taking responsibility for thus reopening the dispute, the NationalistGovernment would seem to be fully justified. To the contention that its envoys have committed it there is aD effectual answer in the fact that their instructions were made public at the time the envoys were sent—unless it be extravagantly assumed that those instructions as published were vitally at variance with what the envoys were told—and that a safeguarding of Chinese surveillance of the management of the railway was then proclaimed as essential. The present Russian Government has flagrantly violated all its undertakings in connection with the railway, including a promise that it should not be used as a means of Communist propaganda. This violation was the basis of the strong action taken by the National ist Government in dismissing Russian officials from the controlling administrative staff of the railway, and so led to an outbreak of hostilities and the destructive invasionjsf Manchuria by Soviet troops. Russia, although a signatory of the BriandKellogg peace pact, refused foreign mediation and pressed her military advantage. The Soviet leaders are apparently bent on overriGling the Chinese protests, and there is little; apparent likelihood of a peaceful end to the trouble. Intervention by other Powers seems now to be inevitable.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19300215.2.36

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20490, 15 February 1930, Page 10

Word Count
315

CHINA AND RUSSIA. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20490, 15 February 1930, Page 10

CHINA AND RUSSIA. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXVII, Issue 20490, 15 February 1930, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert