Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LONDON CHURCHES.

A SCHEME FOR DISPOSAL.

THREAT TO HISTORIC PLACES

OPPOSITION TO REMOVAL.

By Telegraph—Press Association —Copyright.

(Received 7.40 p.m.) A. and N.Z, LONDON. Nov. 26

The Disposal of Churches Bill, which provides for the disposal of 19 city churches, was brought before the House of Commons, when Lard Hugh Cecil moved that the bill should be presented for Royal assent.

He explained that the measure authorised the sale of the sites of certain London churches. Owing to the loss of the Sunday population there were now 47 parishes for 12,000 resident inhabitants.

Nothing would be done without careful inquiry, but if the parishes in the citywere reduced in number their funds could be assigned to other churches in the diocese of London. The bill would place a difficult matter in the hands of a commission in full touch with moderate public opinion. Sir T. Bow at or, a former Lord Mayor of London, moved the rejection of the bill, urging that the object of the measure was to pull down great ancient churches in the city to get money to spend elsewhere. Lord Hugh "Cecil's motion was rejected by 124 votes to 27.

The suggestion to dispose of these churches has been the subject of much controversy in recent years. When the bill was introduced in the House of Lords it was passed by 71 votes to 54, and there soon followed many pretests against the measure. A petition against the bill was presented to the House of Commons. The petition set out that nine of the threatened churches had been built before the great fire of London, and others had been built by Sir Christopher Wren. These had been mainta : ned through the ages by the parish rate payers. It was pleaded that tbes<s churches should not be closed without the consent of the latter. The petition claimed that the edifices are really national memorials of great historical and architectural value, and that their disposal should not lie removed from the control of Parliament.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19261127.2.68

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19496, 27 November 1926, Page 11

Word Count
336

LONDON CHURCHES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19496, 27 November 1926, Page 11

LONDON CHURCHES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19496, 27 November 1926, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert