Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PREFERENCE DISPUTE.

AN INTERPRETATION SOUGHT. [BY TELEGRAPH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION.] GISBORNE. Monday. Application was made to the Arbitration Court this ,evening by a Gisborno employer through the inspector of factories for an interpretation of the preference clause in the Drivers' Award: Was an employer hound to dismiss from his service a youth, non-unionist, when requested to do so by the union, provided there was a member of the union, either youth or adult, qualified for that particular work ? Argument was hoard and the Court reserved its decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19260330.2.163

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19289, 30 March 1926, Page 14

Word Count
86

PREFERENCE DISPUTE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19289, 30 March 1926, Page 14

PREFERENCE DISPUTE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LXIII, Issue 19289, 30 March 1926, Page 14

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert