Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SHIP DISPUTE SETTLED.

STOKEHOLD COMPLEMENT.

MEN'S CONTENTION UPHELD.

[BY TELKG3APH. —PRESS ASSOCIATION.]

WELLINGTON, Monday.

The first dispute under the new award for seamen was heard' before the Disputes Committee last week, and the committee's decision, which was in favour of the union, was communicated to the parties to-day. The committee comprised Mr. N. D. Hood, chief inspector of machinery and chief inspector of ships. (chairman), Captain P. A. Petersen, Messrs. W. H. Bennett and W. A. Kennedy (shipowners), and Messrs. J. H. Adams, W. T. Young, and J. Dent (Seamen's Union). The subject of the dispute was the manning of the stokehold of the Union Steam Ship Company's Waitomo. The employers' case was that the vessel was built in 1911 and purchased. by the Union Company two years later. Prior to coming into their possession,'and for a year afterwards, her complement of firemen was six. The company alleged that in 1914 it was forced by the union to ship three extra firemen for the run from Wellington to Newcastle, i although . there was a definite agreement that these extra hands were to be retaind only while the vessel was engaged in trades other than intercolonial and coastal. Since 1915 nine firemen were carried, and the company claimed that _ the Waitomo should revert to: her original complement unless she were engaged in trade that took her into the tropics. ■'. , .. ~ The case for the union was that no agreement existed, that nine firemen were fully 'employed in the stokehold maintaining steam, and that it would be a, hardship on the men if the stokehol-d complement were reduced.

Evidence was heard from both sides. ■ No agreement having been reached at the hearing, the chairman decided that the stokehold complement of the Waitomo should remain as at present.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19230529.2.105

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18411, 29 May 1923, Page 8

Word Count
294

SHIP DISPUTE SETTLED. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18411, 29 May 1923, Page 8

SHIP DISPUTE SETTLED. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18411, 29 May 1923, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert