Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION AT SEA.

THE THE.EE-MILE LIMIT.

NO LIQUOR TO BE CARRIED.

ALL SHIPS UNDER BAN. By Telegraph Press Association—Copyright. A. and N.Z. « WASHINGTON. April 30. ■;:, The ! Supreme Court upheld the : Daugherty ruling under the Prohibition Amendment.. that foreign ships cannot bring v liquor within the three-mile limit, even; as sea stores, thus upsetting the Federal' Court injunctions. ■ - The Court simultaneously upheld the appeal against the Daugherty ruling banning liquor on American ; ships throughout the world, ruling that: there is nothing in the Prohibition Amendment; that prevents American . ships carrying liquor in foreign waters. /; ■ . • ' '. 1; ■:. The Supreme Court decisions were made on appeals from the Lower Court decisions, in the first instance by Mr. H. M. Daugherty, Attorney General, and in the second instance by the American shipping companies.' '-; 7 ,:; :r ' The Court's ruling is based on . the decision that the Prohibition Amendment is only applicable to physical territory under the United.. States' " sovereign control. Foreign and American shipping are thus placed on an equal footing, neither being allowed to bring liquor within the threemile limit, but both are able to carry it outside. \ ' ' „ " ;•;The Washington correspondent of the New York Times states . that the anu prohibition ; forces at first were inclined to take some satisfaction from the Supreme Court's decision. . They pointed out that American and foreign vessels could take on liquor at some port of call and leave itV. on - entering V", and departing from American territorial waters. The prohibition forces, however, apart from indicating that this would take some * vessels out of their way, asserted that legislation would be introduced in the coming session of Congress forbidding ; vessels ion American registry to carry liquors at any time; • The Shipping Board furthermore has announced that Government-owned vessels will continue : " dry " . irrespective. of the Court's decision. * :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19230502.2.89

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18388, 2 May 1923, Page 9

Word Count
296

PROHIBITION AT SEA. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18388, 2 May 1923, Page 9

PROHIBITION AT SEA. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18388, 2 May 1923, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert