Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNKNOWN BABY'S FATE.

BODY FOUND ON BEACH. DEATH DUE TO ASPHYXIA.' j The adjourned inquest concerning the ; death of a newly-born male child whose ! j body was found on the Stanley Bay \ ! Beach, on the afternoon of February 19, j ! was held by the coroner, Mr. W. R. Mc- I | Kean, S.M., yesterday. The body was { found by a lad aged 15, who with another I j boy was gathering firewood on the beach, i j It was lying on its side, partly embedded I j in the sand, between high and low water ' i marks, and facing the incoming tide. I j The body was unclothed, and blood was i oozing from the nose. Constable Hedlund, of Devonport, who j went to the beach in response to a tele- | ! phone message from the caretaker of the J i Calliope Dock, described the position of | the body. There were no instruments ' ; near it. He made a careful examination i :in the vicinity, but could not find any j i clothing or other article that might have | ■ been associated with the death. The | edge of the infant's mouth was on the j. ! sand. The body was cold, but rigor • | mortis had not sot in. Special inquiries j i had been made regarding the parentage of j : the child or the person who disposed of I the body, but so far no evidence had rej suited. Dr. D. N. W. Murray, who with Dr. i Gilmour had made a post-mortem e-xami- ] ' nation, said the body was that of a well I developed male child. There were no \ j signs of decomposition. There were no | ! marks on the skin to indicate violence. ] The infant had breathed freely, and had | lived less than 48 hours, and probably less j than 24 hours. It had, in his opinion, j been dead less than 24 hours, and had | been immersed in the water only a short j j time, if at all. The cause of death, in | witness' oninion. was asphyxia, probably ' due to suffocation. The condition of tho J ! body tended to exclude death from drown- j c j ing. Witness said that Dr. Gilmour j 1 ; agreed with his finding. ! 1 The coroner's finding was that death j ] was due to asphyxia, probably following i { | suffocation, there being no evidence to | { show how the asphyxia was caused. ( i' ===== 1< ■■■ i

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19230310.2.122

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18345, 10 March 1923, Page 11

Word Count
396

UNKNOWN BABY'S FATE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18345, 10 March 1923, Page 11

UNKNOWN BABY'S FATE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18345, 10 March 1923, Page 11

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert