DIVORCED WIFE'S CLAIM.
t ALIMONY SUIT ' FAILS. 'H ; FREQUENTER OF HOT||£ 1 [* TELEGRAPH. —PRESS .. ASSOCIA®*)' II! I . »{BT TELEGRAPH.—PRESS • M - - WELLINGTON, MoniW |fl Judgment has been given by Mr. §9 t'ce Hosking in the Auckland ffijj- ■■ Phelps v. Phelps. At the proceeding a |1 > the northern city , Christopher Shi®® 1 iiS was cited 'as : ,co-respondent. / Mwfi j fl orginally proceeded against his j I divorce on the grounds of alleged aauW | ffl A counter petition was lodged. M Court found that respondent had tß| ted 5 adultery with Shannon. ■ later filed a petition asking for jj alimony./ , Dealing with this action, Hib 9 , said it was not a case of ordiM'j . IMP ji mony; the. conduct of . the patties > ||fl their means had to be taken W® jM } . federation. He was not satisfied M spondenfc was living a good lite. . H shown that she had been seen co®io| | of an. hotel much too well J .• woman in the difficult pecuniary 1 H in which she alleged she was. ' Tbe ||11 allegation was met by a statemeii | ! the clothes were a gift, but ' ~ l|l| deny having frequented hotel: Twj | accordingly, declined to make the,. .| order. , '
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19230227.2.53
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18335, 27 February 1923, Page 6
Word Count
194DIVORCED WIFE'S CLAIM. New Zealand Herald, Volume LX, Issue 18335, 27 February 1923, Page 6
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.