Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AGAINST MONOPOLIES.

BTRINGENT PROPOSALS.

NEW SOUTH WALES BILL. [from ova. own correspondent.] SYDNEY. Oct. 12. Labour supporters in New South Wales have been making a great outcry against the expressed intention of the Government to repeal the Profiteering Act, a measure of the late Labour Government, intended to save the workers from the operation of unduly high prices. The Nationalist Government, however, now proposes to go even further than its predecessors in this matter, and while doing away with the Profiteering Act, it will introduce legislation of a kind previously unknown in New South Wales for the repression of harmful monopolies and restraints of trade The new Bill provides that any person is guilty of an offence who monopolises or attempts to monopolise, or combines or conspires with any other person to monopolise the production or manufacture of, or the trade or commerce in, any commodity or article of commerce, or the supply of any services. Every contract made or entered into in contravention of this provision shall be illegal and void. A penalty of £500 is provided for an offence under the Act, and a second offence shall be indictable, with a penalty of £500, or 12 months' imprisonment. In the case of a corporation, the fine for a first offence is £600, and for a second

offence £1000. Provision is made for a Supreme Court injunction to prevent a harmful monopoly or " arrangement " from continuing its operations. The. penalty is a fine up to £500 a day for each day during which the offence continues. Anybody injured by a monopoly or trade arrangement may sue for damages and recover treble

damages.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19221019.2.121

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18225, 19 October 1922, Page 9

Word Count
273

AGAINST MONOPOLIES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18225, 19 October 1922, Page 9

AGAINST MONOPOLIES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18225, 19 October 1922, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert