Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HYPOCRISY.

(Published by Arrangement.)

THE TWO VOICES.

The anti-prohibitionists say that prohibition in the U.S.A. breeds lying, hypocrisy, deceit and crime. What did license breed, and what did the liquor traffic know about what it bred?

The, liquor traffic in America spoke with faro Toices. It held conventions and issued one kind of report for the public to read, and private reports for its mem6ers to read. In October, 1915, at the 55th Odnivention of the U.S. Brawera' Association a speaker said:—"As a matter of fact, the American saloon is performing more social service and performing it more efficiently than the churches ana the charity organisations put together." That appeared in the report issued for tho public to read. But earlier in that same year there had been presented to the Brewers' Association at a special meeting a report from an investigator they had emp'oyed to find out what the public comp'ained about in the saloons, and this is what the report said:—"Selling in prohibited hours, gambling, selling to intoxicated men, rear rooms, unclean places, invading residential districts, prostitution, eelling to miners, keeping open at night, brewers financing ignorant foreigners who are not citizens, brewery controlled saloons, cabarets, Sunday selling, treating, free lunch, sales to speakeasies, bucket trade, signs, screens, character of men." Two years earlier, in 1913, Mr. Nagel addressing the Brewers' Association said:—"A certain percentage of the brewers do not care where the money comes from . . . This talking (of .reform) at conventions, has b«en clone for 20 years ... it has no effect." This, of course, was not issued for tho public to read. Now there is surely some lying, hypocrisy and deceit in pretending that the saloon was doing more and better 'social service' than the churohes, when for 20 years the brewers knew that their establishments were social, moral and criminal p'ague spots. No wonder Mr. Hugh Fox, secretary of the Brewers' Association said:—"We have got to realise that the public is intensely concerned in this question, that the public is going to sottlo it for us whether we want it or not." License always breeds the same things. The public did settle it in the U.S.A and made a good exchange by adopting prohibition in place of license. Prohibition in N.Z. is Worth a Trial.— N.Z. illiane* Publicity. 23

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19220315.2.130

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 9

Word Count
383

HYPOCRISY. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 9

HYPOCRISY. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIX, Issue 18040, 15 March 1922, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert