Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COW.

DISPUTE OVER A DRAY. ;; QUESTION OF GUARANTEE. Vv A dispute arising from the silo of ft- '. spring dray came before Mr. J. E. Wil- ■/ son, S.M., in the Magistrate's Court* vefr/~ . terday. Bernard Murray U->thj imi :,'. Ernest Malcolm Henderson \Xr 3en« , nett) trading as the Farmnre' bazaar, . Albert Street, claimed from Ovpby Bur. dett (Mr. Puidal), farmer, £50'. 10s, being the price of certain chattels//. including a spring dray, £38, sold and delivered to defendant with freight Be-. . fendant counter-claimed for STfi da>:.igj*i for alleged breach of guarantee. He' alleged, that a condition of the sale of . the dray, which was required i'or carrying cream, was that plaintiff guaranteed it to carry 20 to 25 cwt fflfesfefci torily. Defendant found the dray would not carry such -weight, and retiirnea it." to plaintiffs, claiming thus to be free t from liability to pay for it. But if M. were bound to pay he claimed **■-,;,.< s damages for breach of guarantee. Tlio , . guarantee was denied by plaintiffs. . The magistrate said he considered aV .' .. fendant did not get what, he bargained., for. 'Judgment was for defendant °n ; the claim, thus disposing of the counter- ,\ claim, with co?ts £9 5s 6d. : ,■ ERECTION OF A MONUMENT. \ . A claim for £31, including £1 interest. , ; for the erection of a monument, was ~-..__ made by McNab and Mason (Mr. Hogg), *, / ' monumental masons, against Thomas. . ■ Carty (Mr. Player), before Mr. W. «• McKcan, S.M. For the defence it was; \ ... contended that the" monument wa s B ° b " accovding to specifications, and that the . work was not done'in an honost and workmanlike manner. Expert evidence / was called by plaintiffs to provo the , work was done in a satisfactory manner. / Judgment was given foi plaintiffs for £30, with costs £8 2s.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19211216.2.9

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17966, 16 December 1921, Page 4

Word Count
291

MAGISTRATE'S COW. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17966, 16 December 1921, Page 4

MAGISTRATE'S COW. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17966, 16 December 1921, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert