Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEASE OF OFFICE SUITE.

DISPUTE OVER AGREEMENT.

ORDER FOR PERFORMANCE. An order for the specific performance of an alleged verbal agreement it,.- the lease of the top floor of Qleeson'a Buildings, High Street, was sought by Francis Kneebone, warehouseman, and John David Jones, builder {Messrs. McYeagh and Hogg), against Frederick Calvi Freeman, metaphysician (Mr. 1 Hall Skelton), before Mr. Justice Adams in the Supreme Court yesterday. Plaintiffs contended ? that a verbal agreement existed, dated May 4, 1921, for the lease of the floor to defendant for five years at a rental of £5 10s a week. Plaintiffs- relied on certain acta of part performance, comprising the erection of partitions subdividing the floor into a number of rooms. Plaintiffs stated that they had lost £171 in making the alterations, and claimed the recovery of this sum, together with £100 general damages. The defence was a general denial, together with an affirmative defence submitting that the alleged agreement was not a completed undertaking, and did not conform to the Statute of Frauds. Plaintiffs took a risk m commencing alterations in view of such a partial transaction. His Honor held that the agreement was sufficiently binding for the purposes of the law, because defendant had inspected the premises while alterations were in progress, and had given slight instructions for the work. The law aid nob say what amount or quality of instructions would make a person liable, but he . was satisfied that in this case the quality of the instructions brought them within the equitable doctrine of part performance. An order for specific performance was < made out against defendant, the terms i of the lease to be settled by the Court. ' Judgment was given for defendant on the claims for specific and general damages. Costs were allowed plaintiffs on the lower scale.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19210917.2.99

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17889, 17 September 1921, Page 8

Word Count
299

LEASE OF OFFICE SUITE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17889, 17 September 1921, Page 8

LEASE OF OFFICE SUITE. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVIII, Issue 17889, 17 September 1921, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert