Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WATERSIDE WORK.

THE CO-OPERATIVE SCHEME. POINTS FOR CONSIDERATION. j The Welfare League writes on the ■ subject of the co-operative stevedoring | scheme as follows The Wellington Chamber of Commerce having decided to set up a committee to watch the movement ansi report as considered necessary jwe desire respectfully to suggest that ! this committee might meet forthwith and go tuily into these questions relating to ' this proposed scheme :— ' " ' (i) Would a combination on the lines suggested detrimentally or helpfully . | atlect the harbour boards, the small shipping companies, the existing stevedores , | the consignees of goods, the general 1 public ? ; i . a genuine form of co-opera-j tion for the shipping companies to enter i into a mode of partnership with the New Zealand Waterside Workers' Federation while the leaders of that bodv de i clare that their purpose is to secure full control of the industry and before they havj given any guarantee that they will j not use their representative authority to ' effect such an end ? i (3) Is the scheme one of payment on results or will that principle be governed by what is meant by "current rates." I (4) Is the scheme :n practice likely to I operate in the direction of giving pre- ■ Terence of service to the association employers over those not in the association which might materially affect the small shipowners and * the harbour boards em- , ploying labour' (5) Is the hiring and purchasing of ' gear, interest, insurance and allotment of profits likely to entail and increase in | charges for the handling of goods * j (6) Will the payment of special ; despatch rates for speedy work if ; coupled with payment of demurrage rates ! lower than the agreement in case of slow ! work be likely to minimise or accentuate industrial disputes and possible conflict ? (7) Is the scheme likely to simplify and give more direct control of the administration of the waterside industry * The lea true further notes that important points not dealt with in the published draft of the scheme are' i {1~( Will there be any guarantee given ] j against recurring stoppages of work ? j (2) To what extent are the parties prej pared to allow the fall scheme and its ; working to be subject to public review ?

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19201222.2.73

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17660, 22 December 1920, Page 7

Word Count
371

WATERSIDE WORK. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17660, 22 December 1920, Page 7

WATERSIDE WORK. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17660, 22 December 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert