Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE JUTLAND REPORT.

! DEMAND FOR PUBLICATION. j ATMOSPHERE OF SUSPICION. J , , LONDON. Oct 28. A special article in the Times dealing i with the battle of Jutland condemns the l refusal to publish the official account of I the battle, for the first reason that bv this i refusal the Navy i a being deprived of the greatest opportunity of learning how to ; fight, and secondly, that when shipbmld--1 ln « programmes are on the brink of revolu- ; tionary changes the country is prevented i from studying the only battle where | Dreadnoughts fought, and where great ; destroyer attacks were made on them ; Admiral Lord Beatty and Admiral Lord , Jellicoe represent two sdiools of thought I as wide as the Poles asunder, and their officers have won an almost equal number of decorations. The article instant a fleet-surgeon who received the D.S 6 for his arrangements with regard to the treat ment of the wounded. It is now disclosed that there was not a single wounded man on his ship. " Such facts," states the article "accompanied by the conceal ; ment of the official story of the battle ' ma , e the very worst of impressions on the public

" There is no demand tor a court : martial in connection with Jutland " coni tinues the writer. " bet there is a growi ing atmosphere of suspicion that the gen- : eral conduct of the battle was bad for the , country and its trust in the N'avv How- ; ever painful it may be. the onlv wav to re- ! establish confidence in the Navy and safe j guard the future is fearlessly to" reveal the I fact*, and allow the public" to judge." ! The Daily Mai! publishes a leading arj tide headed. " The Jutland Hush-up.'' to • which the paper has incessant!-.- referred ; l ate ' v - It now definitely accuses Admiral ; Lord Jellicoe of having prolonged the war ; for two vears by- turning a wav from th° beaten German fleet, which was half his strength, and which was placed id his hands by the gallant fight of Admiral Lord Beat v.

; Colonel Sir James Craig. Financial Peci retary to the Admiralty, informed VisI count- Curzon (Coalition-Unionist j, in the. ' Hoa*e of Commons, that it was not proj posed to publish the official account of I the Battle of Jutland, but all the evidence ! prepared by the Admiralty would be m- ! corpora ted in a volume by Sir Julian ■ Stafford Corbett, Director of the- historical I section of the Committee of Imperial I Defence, which weald be published nest 1 Tear, i"

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19201109.2.58

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17623, 9 November 1920, Page 5

Word Count
421

THE JUTLAND REPORT. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17623, 9 November 1920, Page 5

THE JUTLAND REPORT. New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17623, 9 November 1920, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert