Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE TRAMWAYS DISPUTE

:* ■ .. \ • . i. . .. PROPOSED CONFERENCE. : __ : ciyx council's 'action. ' — '•« DOMINION AWARD FAVOURED - Tin tramways dispute J" "['™tsiy ' at : last evenings meeting oif th # U J • Council by the Mayor, Mr. J. H 1 vho read c»rjespondenco .on Uo suby v shcnvino' what negotiation* bad token ' : place to data Daring the vacation per ■ th o dispute was left by the council m the - hank of the Mayor, tho chainnan of the ' Public Services domnuttee, Mr, W. J-•-V : Hoidworth', and the general manager of 'the tramways. Mr. J. ff. Walklate. - , in his statement Mr. Gunson said that v 'on January'ls a circular • had been reV: ceived from the Sew Zealand Transport Workers' Advisory • Board, to whom the - dispute bad been relegated by the various unions uxging tho tramwayu authorities ui, the dii'orcnt centres to endeavour to estab- £ lish a national industrial agreement bo-. • tTCMi the employers and employees concaned throughout tho Dominion. With a • km/ of arriving at. a basis of such an agreement; it was suggested that pro-! : : -'.. ILiiinarv ' conferences between ;. tho parties : -v. in .each. centre he arranged. Tho -.board «:'v suggested that another Dominion infer- • ence fee held after the proposed local conferences. , - ' -.- Policy, of the;, Council.; :

Th fl Maror said that, in reply to this circular* he had telegraphed to tho bo^d - that ho did not see that • conference the' Auckland tramway men at present could do any good. He pointed put that . "in Auckland the men.wew jig under agreements vrtdch were completed w: th the - ' IVansport Workers' Association ie February, aid June last. These would ' nature in May. Therefore, in about three u.onths . time, "tiho council must negotiate ujta the association for » freak agreement, uovided : : - 110 Dominion agreement was arrived at m ' the meantime. ' Ho had no doubt the counv - oil Would be able to com® to a mutually acceptable agreement. In these .circum- ' • stances, what object was tliere for a conference in Auckland at present, as , the association could not eipuct tbe • council to discuss J the question of ; ft Dominion Y: /: agreement unless all parties concerncd . were .present? Eegarding a "Dominion agreeC •'"• ment . the council was in favour of this, and if all others concerned were prepared to attend another conference, -having already approved the principle of a Do- •: minion aerepment-, ■ and if it were. understood that the conference met" with - tho i object of. arranging wages and conditions for the whole of the Dominion, represent*. ;. Jives of the Auckland City Council would attend. But, as the last conference, was Vy< ' abortive, the council must; have an understanding with the others concerned trial V"' they were seriously disposed to the accept-j * ; ante' of Dominion terms, and that ne:t%" • they nor the association would disagree' . - • i-iniply because there might bo some small ; , , differences as to questions which should ( > any must be. settled amicably. ; The AtekJasd. cc<ancil would do everything reasonable /'and possible to facilitate a • satisfactory sottJeraent, but could nat !en.r:c--is m other centres of,'tie"Dominion : : . eyjepi oa i-ho tenna ho had'outlined. ,

reisjOTgicß ..Dssired at Wellington., ! • •• ,> Mr. Goasoa .said thai; on' •iYeSaestby he had received * a t-elegram : " from JlO . Mayor of Wellington, Mr. J. .P. • Luis, M.P., stilting that} it' was: impera- . tive v '.'hat a new agreement should bo *\r arrived at in Wellington, • Mr. Luke'raged : that a further conference be held to con- . sider "the Question of a Dominion award, or, as an alter jafrive, anagreement > for cs.ch island. Mr. Luke invited representatives of th« 'Auckland: Council to attend a ; 7 conference to be held st tho Wellington Town Hal! on January 28. • . v :i ' Mr. Gun son said he had' replied to Mr. Luke stating 4 that ' Auckland favoured '"ft Dominion sward and would appoint , representatives to ■ attend the conference, ' provided all othersconcerned confirm eel their, acceptance of the principle of a Dominion; award, and the conference) was :/' called for th e purpose of settling pay and conditions. His reply- had farther stated . that Auckland worn not become a 'party \ tp' an • agreement ■ for the * North Island only. The alternative for Auckland to a : local award was a Dominion agreement embracing all systems. He askefcl Mr. Luke 1 V t<i intimate to .ill ; the other proprietary interested tho Jittitndo of ' Auckland; and Jo advise him as noon as possible wfcsUier i they agreed to the conference on these terras. He understood from Mr. Luke's telegram that as far as WeL'jagtou was concerned theso conditions Wvuld be ac- ' .. ceptable. > , '* >{* Men Understand Position. :.*•• * Commenting upon this correspondence, 1 the ; Mayor said,, the position •so far as ■ir Auckland jvSs concerned was; ;peiiectly , clear, and owing to interviews with the . representatives of the "local union, was • thoroughly understood by them as; well a£ j by the Transport Waiters' Associtaion .in Wellington. The last conference had ; • proved abortive, although the represents ; tives of the Auckland City Council who had attended " had signified their approval . • of a Dominion award, and had stated .- that .they were prepared to abide by the ■ decision arrived at by the conference, ' whatever 'it might be.'.' Christchurch, however, had objected, as it w£nt«d v its own terms and conditions. This had led =,i to the utility of the conference. "i ' • The action taken by the mayor and sub--5 > committee was approvijd. .: ~ ~

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19200123.2.91

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17375, 23 January 1920, Page 6

Word Count
866

THE TRAMWAYS DISPUTE New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17375, 23 January 1920, Page 6

THE TRAMWAYS DISPUTE New Zealand Herald, Volume LVII, Issue 17375, 23 January 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert