Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FERTILISER WORKS.

■♦ ■ THE SITE AT PENROSE. ■POSITION OF TJHE company.. The opposition to tjio^" proposed erection by the New Zealand /Farmers': Fertiliser Company of fertiliser' manufacturing works at Penrose was the subject of statements yesterday by . Mr. T. W.\ Deakes, ' secretary, ■ and Mr. A. X. Boss, chairman of directors, of ; the .■..'company.'' ■' '•*•;". Mr, JDeakcs said the company had evidence -that at least seven-eighths of tho property-owners within - a mile : radius of they proposed fork's were not opposed to the establishment' of the industry.:'" Per. sistent efforts, however, were being made to lead residents living within 'a" five-mile radius of the proposed works to believe that a... nuisance would be ""created -that would detrimental "''.to health f and property. '/•' "It has been ancertaincd,", continued '; Mr. *peakes] "that well-paid canvassers havo r bean "employed to secure signatures to the ■ petition •or protest, and this is >; without - doubt ':* responsible •: for the energy 1 with which > the petitions have been pushod. 'At' the same time, I am convinced that if a true statement;of the case was 'placed before the residents concerned they would not have-signed:''a petition,, and, would : have : on"pre.d no opposition whatever ' to the erection of tho works. - - The ' directors of '' the ■* company had'-themselves to ,be satisfied that no nuisance ; would } be \ 'created before they entered , into'negotiations' to secure tho proposed site at'Penrose. Opinions were secured from leading scientific exports in the:: Dominion, > who < have ' all '* expressed themselves favourably, w after • taking the full; facts into consideration. i They state .definitely/'that';'tlib;. industry will not . affect -in ' any,' way anyone in > the nasi'deatial 'areas .' of Penrose, BUerslio,-'o,' Mount Wellington districts, ';■ \ ■'•'. * ' ■ ''" Tho J members of . One-Tree Hill Road : Board, together with the directors of the company, visited Penrose for the' purpose ■ of.- inspecting 'the ■•■. site and'. meeting the residents to ;> discuss jobjections. " Tho - number of 1 objectingpresidents' present was ' four, two ' residing fin * the One-tree .Hill district' and two from an adjoining dig" trict. Although they : ; have had" ample ■ opportunity to bring . < forward scientific data to substantiate their statements and ; back tho petitJtmTlothirtg'of this kind has ' been : produced,, and | no. reasonable argument against the establishment of the works ; has ; . yet been forthcoming. , Jt has. been 'Stated, that the galvanised iron 'roofing wit} be" discoloured in the vicinity of thjj works? but- buildings ': constructed of i this material in' the, vicinity of ; other similar worfcs have not been /in:.- any 'way affected. r; Tho 1 * directors feel that the sound : evidence produced that the : 'works will- not .injure either the-health "or " tho ; property of .those in the. neighbourhood is sufficient to' justify the Road Board granting 'the company permission to,/make an immediate commencement with', the erec- > tion '6? r the works."9-."A* ■'''•' """' '.''''"■ : ' ,Mr Boss said. was quite satisfied no ■ injury' to - "public'health' nor any depreciation of. property could be caused'' by the establishment of the '1 works : at -Penrose". ' The".' question 7 was " one, however, ■ which ■ might be Rooked at from. a- wide : point 'of view. He /could -say unhesitatingly '.-• that the ■ supply of * fertilisers-was', the bottom i of .all: the 1 •prosperity .; o;f the - province, : There were millions of acres'of • land which would hot be worth' owning except for fertilisers;' Serious-interference' with ■ tho • supply-might ■-have the effect of making a city of the size of Auckland shrink .'into ; insignificance owing to-lack of produce. If the-farmers-of-the province) : howover,' were assured of an adequate supply of fertilisers./ at a reasonable .;price it"'was > going be of incalculable* benefit, 'not only-to the farmine community,' 1 but also , to the City of Auckland. He 'hoped that ? this 'aspect would;' not bo overlooked; ?"•'

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19170706.2.66

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 16584, 6 July 1917, Page 6

Word Count
591

FERTILISER WORKS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 16584, 6 July 1917, Page 6

FERTILISER WORKS. New Zealand Herald, Volume LIV, Issue 16584, 6 July 1917, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert