MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 16011, 1 September 1915, Page 5

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

JUDGMENT 'BY 4 DEFAULT. ■ Judgment by default, with costs, was given for plaintiff by Mr.; C. v . C< .Kettle, S.M.j in the following civil actions heard in the "Magistrate's Court s yesterday: — Jane Howie v. Harry Yates, Railway Wharf,'Auckland,' : £2 The' New Zealand Commercial: Association v. R. Paul, Pae-lf roa, £29 10s; J. J. 5 Craig, Ltd.," v. C. J. Mitchell, Taumarunui, £8 6s 6d ;- E. A. .Perkins and Company, v. Richard Casey, Eureka, £3 ssj'Ambarys, Ltd v. T. H. Drummond, Epsom, £5 9s 8d; Liquidators New -- Zealand Granite . Quarries, H| Ltd., v.:Tbeo." Ralfe, Oamaru ? * £12 •3s 4d; Wins tone, Ltd., v. E. G. Meynell, Newton, £-* 16s 3d ; W. Lambourne -v. Arthur Cole, Ponsonby; £11 13s 3d: J- Postles v. John Ryan, Queen Street, Auckland. £1 S3; W. Wallace v. Mark Hutton, Birkenhead, £2 7s 3d; Sargood, Son and Ewen, Ltd., v.' E. Healey, Raiuimu, £55 15s 9d : Sargood, Son ana Ewen, Ltd., v. A. M.jH Le Scelle, "Devonport, £71 8s sa; Chandler and Company, Ltd.* v. Henry. Reynolds, Onehunga, £1 15s; L. D. Nathan and Company v. H. Graham", ' Helensville, £31 5s lOd; *R H. Hopkins v. F. W. Candy, Te Awamutu, £33 10s lid"; R. H. Hopkins v. G. H. Browne, Mauriceville, £8 6s 8d ; Stanley Henderson ' v.:.- Ernest Thompson, Papakura, £1 10s: W. Harrold v. J. W. Aughton, Morningside, £1 7s 9d : W. Harrold v. W. F. Lee, Avon dale, £3 17s 6d ; W. W. Macferson v. C. Allen, Dominion Road. Auckland, £6 19.-BM 9d; R. Hannah and Company, Ltd.. y.|H A. White, Epsom, £2 lis 9d ; C. HartnollM v. A. Bell, Queen Street,. Auckland, £] 15s; T. Strange v. C. Bray, Remuera, £2 3s; J- Anderson v. J. Primrose,- Hamilton, £3 8s; W. G. Hutchinson v. John Edwards, Kingsland, £5 los Id;'A. Sinili v. C. J. Ellison. Te Kuiti, £2 0- 6d ; M. J. Woodley v. H. Lawson, Albert Street Auckland, £2 lis. PARTNERSHIP DISPUTE. H A claim for wages was the basis of ar action in which W. Jacobs (Mr. E. jflH Prendergast), deck hand, sought to r»-HB cover £15 from Thomas Francis Nicholl and A. W. McNair, owners of a-harbou vessel. Mr. J. H. Gregory appeared folH the defendant McNair. Nicholls .admitted that the wages were due. McNair sait that he told Nicholl; to discharge Iccobs and that he would not be r=sponsih;-e io any wages that accrued. The magistral |H sard that there was apparently & partmr ship dispute, and that the plaintiff wi> entitled to judgment, which was accord ingly given CLAIM FOR WAGES. H A clerk, named John Stanford (Mr. F H Mueller), claimed from Charles C Sandford (Mr. J. Stanton), dairy pro prietor, the sum of £51 12s, wages _ anr profits alleged to be d=e. Ihe p.amtii: stated that be was appointed manager c-JM the defendant's dairy at Ponsonbv in September, 1914, and an arrangement was come to as to terms. The magistrate, Mr. E C. Cutten,. gave judgment for . plaintUiMM for £13 15?, with costs:- - • • ~. |gj