Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SOLICITORS' CHARGES.

KEEPING ACCOUNTS.

DISCUSSION BY LAW SOCIETY

The question as to whether lawyers should charge for keeping clients' accounts, as banks do, was discussed at the annual meeting of the Auckland District Law Society yesterday.

Mr. W. J. Napier moved : —"That -a uniform fee of 10s per annum be charged to clients for keeping their accounts."

The proposal, he said, was very reasonable. Quite recently, heavy pecuniary obligations of a special character had been imposed on members of the profession, and he desired that they should follow the example of the banking institutions, which charge 10s per annum for keeping accounts. That sum would not in any way compensate a practitioner for keeping a complicated account, but would probably reimburse him on the average. There should be reimbursement for clerical assistance employed.

Mr. M. McGregor seconded the motion, to allow the discussion to proceed. The motion, if passed, would not be binding on the practitioner or the client. Without doubt clients would object to such a charge.

Mr. McVeagh considered the proposal a very unwise one. Such a system would create profound dissatisfaction among trustees and beneficiaries.

Mr. C. J- Tunks said they should have further time to consider the matter. Dr. Bamford said the difficulty was to fix an arbitrary fee to cover all cases. The whole question of the auditing of solicitors' accounts was one of difficulty at pre sent. ' It would be unwise at the present moment to pass a sweeping resolution, particularly where it fixed a definite sum irrespective of other considerations. The resolution was not well timed, and in its present form would arouse some hostility, and possibly give the public a false impression.

Mr. Napier said his object was to get the question discussed and referred to the new council for consideration.

Mr- Lawrie held that the money should not go as a windfall to the employer. A motion to refer the question to the council was carried.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19150129.2.106

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15830, 29 January 1915, Page 7

Word Count
325

SOLICITORS' CHARGES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15830, 29 January 1915, Page 7

SOLICITORS' CHARGES. New Zealand Herald, Volume LII, Issue 15830, 29 January 1915, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert