Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HAMILTON SUPREME COURT.

A DIVORCE SOUGHT.

HIS HONOR'S COMMENTS-

[BY TELEGRAPH.OWN CORRESPONDENT,-]

Hamilton, Tuesday. '.'. Lv the Supreme Court to-day, before Mr. Justice Cooper, Noel George Shakespear -. applied for the annulment of his marriage with Dora Isabel Shakespear, on the grouncTof desertion. The evidence showed . that the parties were married in England in 1890, and came to New Zealand soma . time later. There were two children of • the marriage, both of whom were educated in Auckland. Respondent,, ys6 had' a private income of £7000 or. £,8000, left.' , petitioner on September 22, 1903., fof ,the , purpose of visiting the children 'in Auck- ' land, but she had never returned. .Petitioner stated that respondent was ;£- : wb-. " . man of "very high temper," and "they' had not got on well for years: " He" did not pay anything to the support of '•* the children after respondent left him. • He did not say that respondent was more to blame than himself.

His Honor said the case was an extraordinary one, and it looked like one of mutual consent. The case was adjourned to obtain further evidence as to the parties' married life, about which. His Honor . , said, no one seemed to know. anything, and petitioner had not satisfied the Courti in this respect. .. £500 DAMAGES CLAIMED. The case of Snowden v. the Waitoma County Council, a claim of £500 for daraages caused by alleged negligence, was continued, the plaintiff's case being, to show that the detonators found by the plaintiff, had been negligently left about by the council's employees. This, said defendant's counsel in opening, had not been proved. At most, the case was only one in which suspicion was attached to some employee of the council. '•■■ The case is proceeding. '.:.•■•

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19140311.2.38

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume LI, Issue 15554, 11 March 1914, Page 7

Word Count
283

HAMILTON SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume LI, Issue 15554, 11 March 1914, Page 7

HAMILTON SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume LI, Issue 15554, 11 March 1914, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert