AUCKLAND SUPREME COURT

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 15143, 6 November 1912, Page 7

AUCKLAND SUPREME COURT

NOVEMBER' SESSIONS.

CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES.

Thk following is a list of charges! fio.'far sob down hearing at the criminal sessions of the Supreme Court, which commence on November 19 :— .

Harold Jaraey Weston, indecent* a«ssault. Frank Maher and Wm. John Hogan, breaking and entering at Wellsford. Kiri Kake, indecent assault at, Whinga. rei. _ Taiwlianga Kake, indecent assault at Whangarei. Rose Hea.rd, manslaughter at Auckland. Win. Charles Thorpe, theft at Auckland (four charges).. Thomas O'Loughlin, forgery and false pretences at Taumarunui. Robfc; Wm. Mclndoe, theft from the person at Auckland. Edward Bourke. cattle-stealing at Huntly (two charges). Frank Mitchell, horse-stealing at Whakatane. • Tamati Hop*, forgery at-Whangarei. Kenneth Matlieson' Sutherland ' and Patrick Sullivan, theft from the dwelling at Mercer. Peter Mandeno Sulenta, ' fraudulent omission to account, for moneys received. , John James Weston, theft from a dwelling at To Awamutu. Ovi© Thomas/ theft at Thames.

CIVIL CASES.

The hearing of civil cases will be commenced on November 11.

The following will be heard before His Honor and a jury of. 12 :— Charles Daniel Grey v. Linda Elizabeth Hadley.— £3501 moneys alleged to bo advanced.

Dan Quinlan v. Roy Seccombe. —Claim) £501 damages for alleged slander. Frank Morris v. Thomas Fry and J. and W. Jamieson, Limited.—-For £52 16s special damages, and £700 general damages, for alleged injuries received. Thomas Moody and George Septimus M/oody v. Henry Edward Elliott.For £626 "5s lOd, moneys alleged to be advanced and damages. Matthew Andrew Fcrri v. Tony Martinovich.—For £700 damages for "alleged slander.

.The following will be heatfd before His Honor and a common jury of four : — Leah Lillian Inder v.* William Francis Inder. Claim £182 moneys alleged to be due under deed of separation. Thomas Charles Lloyd-Cox v. Northern Advocate Publishing Company.—For £125 damages, alleged breach of contract* ~ , ' ; James Alexander Snedden v. Auckland Electric Tramways Company, Limited, and W. S. Laurie and Company. —For £400 general damages, and £41 13s special damages, for alleged injuries -received: ■■- William Alexander Carter v. International Harvester Company of "America. —For £194 18s 4d, moneys alleged to be due under hire purchase agreement. Alfred Bradfield v. Auckland Grammar School Board. For £41.0 damages . for alleged injuries received. Margaret Rogers Brewer v. Auckland Electric Tramways Company. For £214 19s damagea for alleged injuries received. The following will be heard before His . Honor alone :— H. E. Partridge and Company v. A. H. Nathan. Limited.— £145 14a 7d. value of goods undelivered, and £15 damages. Edwin Albert WatkinH v. Jas. Henry Armstrong.—Claim for specific performance and £200 damages for alleged wrongful actions (counterclaim £182 18s 7d, amount of judgment against and for alleged injuries). William John Cnrry and William Holme (St. John Lyons, trading aft William John Curry and Company v. Easson, Limited. — Claim £371 6s 4d commission alleged to be due. " '•■;•' Frederick Carr, Arthur Herbert Hallen, and William Prater v. Andrew Haniia. — Decree for dissolution! of partnership. Mary Angeline Benwell v. Tlieo'philus Wake.—For £100 damages for alleged injury to business and injunction. Moses McKinley v. Whangarei County Council.—For £2*50 damages for alleged injury to property and writ of mandamus. Mary Caroline Worsell v. John Woods. —For 'decree for specific performance, etc. William Pierpont Black v. New Zealand Federation of Labour and Alexander Grigg. —For £450 damages for alleged libel. Thomas Walsh v. New Zealand Federation of Labour and Alexander Grigg.— £450 damages for alleged libel. Kauri Timber Company v. Ellen, O'Connor. W. McLiskv. and John E. Hunt.—£422 13s 2d for work done.

Everard Buthven Tyldeu and Edgar Spiers v. Thomas Johnstone.-For decree for specific performance, etc. Norman McLean v. George,. Turnout! .Niccol.—For . £500. balance. of purchase money alleged to be due. Counterclaim for £600, moneys alleged to have been advanced under agreement. • Francis Henry Grayson, William Arthur Grayson, and George Herbert Grayson v. Benjamin Grayson.For action'to revoke probate, etc. ' Dennis Moroney v. George Henning.— For £450 damages for alleged breach of agreement, etc. Frank Jagger v. Elsie- Farquharson.— Action for probate in solemn form. etc.