Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A DREDGING PROBLEM.

A LITTLE BILL FOR SILT. .WHERE DID IT COME FROM? 1 A pbdcuaii position has arisen be'.WKtl the City Council and the Harbour B*J-|j with regard to the silt which is washed J " down the city eewers into the harbour § near the Railway Wharf. As the matt**.; 1 was explained by the Mayor and the city, f ; engineer at last night's meeting of the 1 Council, an agreement exists between tliß ft two bodies so that the Board, has to giva | notice to tho City Council when the art. J needs removal, and, if necessary, to remove it at +he Council's expense. TO ■_ Council has at various limes paid smalt amounts for dredging that has been done* but some time ago it was mtw l w™. «J account from the Harbour Board for WJ g months' dredging, the amount being *U» I 12s. As this sum seemed excessive, wane | greater than the total for many years patt, ; f tbo Mayor went to tho Harbour Bows! «J :; investigate the matter, and willi »«■ j„ another bill for £1306 10s Id, Fhica ta ;■ was told represented work that had W |» been charged for. The city engineer, Mr. Bush, recommended that *0"» »-| : the amount charged seemed out of all p. - g portion to the amount of .which *•» 1 down the sewers, the Council should wy , to arrange to make a regular annua* ; payment. . The Works Committee ream* jJ mended that the lesser account should M ,: refused, and £300 be offered in full « W» ment of the other claim. ~.»,„ C Mr. Bush said, in reply to the- Mayor, that the amount of silt alleged to'-nwe | been dredged and to have come from * . drain serving a comparatively s^, o *?* ; during tho past ten months exceeded tw»\;- : total amount of metal and other materia put on tho whole of tho city streets dor- , ing the whole year. It was preposterous | to imagine "that the city was responsiow » for 30,000 cubic yards of. silt. He o*lieved that the building of the tide «* | flector, which checked the tidal stream, ~ had resulted in an increase in the *&<&&;■ I of silt deposited in the neighbourhood. t - To arrango for a yearly payment would j» the most satisfactory method until tfl» | J sewage was all diverted into the n»w, I drainage system. . ■'.-'■ 1 The committee's recommendation ■*-* adopted.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19120419.2.42

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 14971, 19 April 1912, Page 6

Word Count
388

A DREDGING PROBLEM. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 14971, 19 April 1912, Page 6

A DREDGING PROBLEM. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 14971, 19 April 1912, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert