MUSICAL COMPETITIONS.
Sir,—Had the executive explained in th«» I communication to me that want of fur.de *.! 9 tlw reason for withholding second prize « I would have been perfectly satisfied to fore!" « jour claim ; but no explanation was offers ■ except that we were informed the re-nriS I ; did not permit a second prize under theS 9 , cumstaiiccs. This is what we took exception I i to. Iho lobulation 111 question savs- ''rrJ fl j less there are at leas! four competitors X 9 ! second prize may not he awarded This d il ; course, also implies that, it may he awarded 9 ; and so we naturally wished' to know on 1 : what (pounds it was withheld. If the oxcni I • live do . not intend to (rive a second prize i„ J I .such circumstances, the regulation should I ; read thus: I nless there are at least four I j competitors a second prize shall no' 11 I , awarded. Then competitors would under® 9 stand the position definitely B W. Taylor, Hon. Sec. Trinity Ct<,ir • j]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19120223.2.17.5
Bibliographic details
New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 14924, 23 February 1912, Page 4
Word Count
173MUSICAL COMPETITIONS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIX, Issue 14924, 23 February 1912, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the New Zealand Herald. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Auckland Libraries and NZME.
Log in