Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CHARGES AGAINST BAKERS.

': -. .'' ' - ' [BT TELEGBArn.—OWN COHKESrOXIJEXT.] -''. . Rotorua, Tuesday, i The Magistrate's Court was occupied most of yesterday and to-day hearing cases arising out of breaches of the bakers' award, One employer was fined £2 and costs for failing to keep a time-book. Another was prosecuted for the same offence, for failing to pay overtime, and for dismissing a man on account of his connection with the union. On the first charge he was fined £1 and costs, and on the second £3 and costs. The third charge was dismissed. A foreman baker was charged with not claiming his overtime. The inspector of awards was non-suited on the grounds that the failure to demand was not proved..... .' : .-v' .'." :? ■;> ■-•. ,:. ; .■;'■.''■.-.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19100323.2.84

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 14326, 23 March 1910, Page 8

Word Count
117

CHARGES AGAINST BAKERS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 14326, 23 March 1910, Page 8

CHARGES AGAINST BAKERS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLVII, Issue 14326, 23 March 1910, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert