Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

VIEWS OF FRUITGROWERS.

THE REGULATIONS SUPPORTED. . The fruitgrowers in the Dominion naturally; * view the agitation of the importers for th« ■■ rescinding of the new fruit fly regulations] with little sympathy. *' Our interests should certainly have soma consideration," said one of the largest fruit* ■ growers in New Zealand to a representativa ; of the Herald yesterday. " Widespread ,\ ruin would follow "were the fly to get a foot* - '" ,' ing in this country. In Nelson, Motueka, Whangarei, and Central Otago hundreds of men have invested large sums of money i in orchards. In one district in Hawke i " .bay £235,000 has beer spent in planting "■ orchards, £45,000 being invested in on« orchard alone. Last year the fruit grown, , in the Dominion was valued at a millions sterling. The New Zealand orchards am.;/ now <?oing ahead rapidly, and the grower* are fast rinding their feet. One season ■ ofifijf nV and all the labour and capital would go' for nothing. There are only a coupk of ■% dozen importers in the whole Dominion,,, . but there are. about 10,000 members of thai Fruitgrowers' Association. p\' "It is a well-known fact that Fiji and •'.,; Tonga in particular are swarming with fly,'' vand the mile limit regulation is only * ' i reasonable one. The old system of relying ; upon inspection on landing for the discovery 1 of fly was full of dangers, and the Depart* ment of Agriculture very rightly recognised-. ! the fact. An Island boat often briu?i ~ : 20,000 packages of fruit to Auckland. How;' - ;.;, could one inspector, or even a dozen, ex- ''.:' ! amine each package in the search for fly? fm , It would be perfectly impossible, for ft] if would take weeks of work. Yet two or* three packages of infected fruit might very >, readily bring about a scourge which wouUi \ destroy every orchard in New Zealand.'., Growers here have had a little experience! " r . of the pest already. A small quantity of infected fruit landed in Auckland caused thai fly to obtain a grip in the orchards on thai North Shore, while the fly also mad* ■iWr •'.'•• appearance at Napiei and Blenheim. The" '.„ ; Department of Agriculture has worked hard to overcome the pest, and ha.- succeeded,, . and it would be highlv unwise to allow the danger to continue. The codlin moth cam* •. from America in a shipment of bad fruit-, I and is to-day one of the worst of pests, at- ; tacking apples, pears, and quinces. *■ '. "And it is not only the Island produce '"J that is a source of immense danger. The fruit which comes from New South W».l<«is equally bad. It is admitted that there, "■ are only six orchards in that State free of iVr . fly. yet there are many people advocating -\ that New South Wales should be 'allowed ' to continue sending us ■fruit. The fly hal ! 'j cost the New South Wale'- orch&rdists V ■■< £2.000,000 up. to date. South Austral* , and West Australia have had the wisdom to stop the importation of fly-infected fruit ', into their confines. One concession uiigM* be made to the importers—bananas which ' C ! are certified as having been shipped grew* § could be allowed into New Zealand free «■? the restrictions applying to other fruit. "The | flv has not yet been found to attack tl* I . green banana. In other regards the rendi- ;| tions are onlv sane and reasonable ones, il the fruitgrowers of New Zealand are to be ■■}?.■ protected." m

SAN JOSE SCALE IN NELSON. [BY TELEGRAPH. PKESS ASSOCIATION'.] Nelson, Thursday. r|; Tn the course of an interview concerning - the steps taken to suppress the San Jose ." scale at Nelson, Mr. Kirk (Government .-; nomologist) was asked wha! war being done with regard to gardens not yet treat- - j ed by the inspector He replied : " Itispec- *| tors, as far as possible, will •oinplete th« I spraying oi affected trees in the Toitoi I Valley, but owners may rely that trees I will not be headed back more than sufficient to enable effective spraying to be car- 1 ried out. The, trees wil' be cut back only I sufficiently low for spraying t, be done " I This implies that on the' protest of house* 1 holders, the virtual wholesale destruction M of fruit trees that was proceeding -has" I been suspended an a consequence of th« »t -M presentations, made.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19080911.2.82

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 13852, 11 September 1908, Page 6

Word Count
705

VIEWS OF FRUITGROWERS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 13852, 11 September 1908, Page 6

VIEWS OF FRUITGROWERS. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLV, Issue 13852, 11 September 1908, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert