Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INVERCARGILL SUPREME COURT.

[BY telegraph.—press ASSOCIATION.] Invercargill, Wednesday. At the Supreme Court to-day, Henry Beckett, of Waimumu, farmer, claimed from Charles and Edward Marshall £200 damages, on the ground that, by reason of the dredging operations of defendants, water had been diverted on to plaintiff's land. Plaintiff also sought an injunction. Defendants counter-claimed for £25 damages, alleging that plaintiff had cut a ditch on defendant's allotment* and tapped the water required for dredging. Judgment was given for defendants on the claim and coun-ter-claim with Is damage* on the latter, costs on the" lowest scale against plaintiff on the claim, and no costs on the counterclaim.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19071219.2.35

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 13625, 19 December 1907, Page 5

Word Count
105

INVERCARGILL SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 13625, 19 December 1907, Page 5

INVERCARGILL SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLIV, Issue 13625, 19 December 1907, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert