Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AUCKLAND SUPREME COURT.

■.'.'■ •' r .. ' IN BANCO,;'.'. ;;,: *.-STO» ia .banco ■ was held before His Honor Mr. Justice .Edwards at the Supreme Court yesterday forenoon. surf GoW Mining Oom r a«y, limited v. Wailu Junetioiti Gild Mining Company, Limited: Motion to remove action from the District Courts of Hamilton and it- I barney into the Supreme .Court of -Auiskland. By consent ah order as moved was .granted. : . ' ,•'-.■;,' l ! V' ; a? e , Infant^GuaixHtinship and Contracts Act, 100. and re Elsie IJockram Shores < infant: Una was a petition by the «i father, Frederick Ceo. Sherer. to be pointed guardian of the child, Elsie Hoc. ram feherer, at present in the Ayr-street Home, Parnell Mr. J. R. Reed appeared m support and Mr. ,J. 0. Martin to oppose on behalf of Ja*. Law, husband of the child's late- mother. After hearing counsel His Honor rwerved bis. decision, ] " "• v ,•;- _ A?,Gisborne'■'. Boundary Fence Dispute: Isiah McSavery, sheep farmer, of Motu (appellant) v. Abbot-ford Smith, sheep fanner, ? Of Motu "(respondent). This was an appeal' from: (be decision; "of the magistrate at -r, Gisborsae (Mr. ;'W,, A. parton, S.M.). Who; 'gave judgment r against McSavery for half cost (£6 7s 3d) of re.pairs to 20 chains of a boundary fence between the properties of the parties .'concerned: erected by . Smith. -The appellant ! refused payment on ground that he desired; that the whole -• fenes,■.< running a distance of 200 chains, should be repaired and placed on the proper line, and held that the balance of ISO chains not being on the proper boundary lino and not contitiuo,is was, not a boundary. ; fence within the raeanipg of the Fencing Act,' 1895. His Honor, after reviewing the ; facts,'/ upheld the gppeal, allowing appellant : . £1 7s costs ; and such, other?costs; ; as might be determined by the Magistrate's Court at. . Gisbowje. > Mr. Crisp was for the-.appellant.. «nd Mr, Finn for respondent. . . ii ii » i «n

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19041115.2.65

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12712, 15 November 1904, Page 7

Word Count
311

AUCKLAND SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12712, 15 November 1904, Page 7

AUCKLAND SUPREME COURT. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12712, 15 November 1904, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert