Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM FOR TWOPENCE.

■ THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL ; THE ! | PLAINTIFF. i ■ Tub case of ' the'Postmaster-General v. Harold Moses, for 2d and costs, upon an unstamped letter, was again called on before Mr. C. C. Kettle, S.M., at the Magistrate's Court yesterday morning. Mr. S. Mays, lor the Crown Solicitor, mentioned that when the case was called on the week before it wa«-adjourned so that Moses might be informed of his application ! for -' special ' costs.' The defendant had ac- | cordingly been notified, arid he again applied accordingly for special costs. The only point at issue, in order to get special costs, wak whether the case had been litigated. He contended > that litigation had taken place, as Moses had forced the Department into Court.. It could not be ques- , tioned that the case was one of public interest. Mr. J. R. Lundon, who was present, here ! mentioned that he -was appearing for Moses. He contended that before the magistrate could determine the point at issue, ho must first of all hear the facts. The real position was that the defendant gave the letter to his message girl for delivery at the Star office. Instead .of doing so the girl posted it accidentally, and Moses, because of that, did not see why he should have to How do you account 'for the defendant paying the amount claimed and costs into Court asked Mr. Kettle. > . -_. "He merely paid the amounts into Court, Your Worship, to avoid publicity, replied Mr. Lundon. "It has never been decided as to whether the Department could claim upon an unstamped letter." Mr. Mays said that that was the first he had heard of the letter being posted without a stamp accidentally. The defendant never told the Department that. What he had really done was to defy the Department and to tell them " to go on ahd prosecute. The case was then adjourned for a Week , for the taking Of evidence. :. . I

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH19040624.2.87

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12608, 24 June 1904, Page 7

Word Count
319

CLAIM FOR TWOPENCE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12608, 24 June 1904, Page 7

CLAIM FOR TWOPENCE. New Zealand Herald, Volume XLI, Issue 12608, 24 June 1904, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert